| Just revisiting the “Simms†debacle 10:23 - Jul 12 with 8317 views | TalkingBlues |
for a brief moment, to all those suggesting we couldn’t compete with Coventry cos they had just received £20 million (it wasn’t, that was a figure in €, so roughly £17 million) do you still think we can’t compete on the money front?
£47 million pumped in already by the Pension mob and plenty more available. |  |
| |  |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:25 - Jul 12 with 3842 views | BondiBlue |
'Debacle'. Really? |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:25 - Jul 12 with 3832 views | N2_Blue |
Do you ever stop?
You’re talking even more nonsense than usual. Stop making stuff up. |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:26 - Jul 12 with 3816 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
debacle LOL.
Are you being sponsored to see how many down arrows you can get every day? |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:28 - Jul 12 with 3789 views | StokieBlue |
The most surprising thing about this post is that you've successfully managed a currency conversion.
SB |  |
| Avatar - M51 - The Whirlpool Galaxy - Taken on 29th April 2024 |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:28 - Jul 12 with 3780 views | jayessess |
Not sure how many times we need to go over FFP rules here.
The EFL caps the amount that clubs can spend relative to their revenue not relative to their owner's bank balance. |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:29 - Jul 12 with 3760 views | Horsham |
Oh bloody hell. Make it stop. |  | | |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:32 - Jul 12 with 3729 views | FrimleyBlue |
Don't forget TB that a fair chunk of that input would be going on the pitch refurbs which is millions itself, let alone e the staples demolition. I'm sure ( but also guessing) that a large majority of it will also just be similar to M.Es input but much larger, to minimise the losses.
We aren't skint.
The pot has money. But we are still a loss making club so there's a lot of balancing to do. And £7 transfers isn't the way to do It. |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:34 - Jul 12 with 3698 views | Hereford_Blue |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:32 - Jul 12 by FrimleyBlue |
Don't forget TB that a fair chunk of that input would be going on the pitch refurbs which is millions itself, let alone e the staples demolition. I'm sure ( but also guessing) that a large majority of it will also just be similar to M.Es input but much larger, to minimise the losses.
We aren't skint.
The pot has money. But we are still a loss making club so there's a lot of balancing to do. And £7 transfers isn't the way to do It. |
I dunno - if we can start bringing players in for 7 quid I reckon it’ll make a pretty big difference |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:36 - Jul 12 with 3668 views | Keno |
what debacle is that??
just out of interest if you want to buy a mars bar Ive got one you can have for £50 |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:37 - Jul 12 with 3636 views | J2BLUE |
The debacle where we didn't bid for him and Hirst was clearly the number one target?
Oh and feel free to look back over my posts. I was saying Hirst would be the one we want before the news broke of him being here and Leicester were likely waiting for their other strikers to get back as they were short. Iheanacho returns and Hirst is here.
Not exactly something you needed a crystal ball for but you really are a bit dim. |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:39 - Jul 12 with 3599 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:34 - Jul 12 by Hereford_Blue |
I dunno - if we can start bringing players in for 7 quid I reckon it’ll make a pretty big difference |
It would be a bit of a worry if we're baulking at a price of £7. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:40 - Jul 12 with 3577 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:34 - Jul 12 by Hereford_Blue |
I dunno - if we can start bringing players in for 7 quid I reckon it’ll make a pretty big difference |
So good I don't even want to to edit that one lol | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:40 - Jul 12 with 3580 views | SitfcB |
This has to be that Elephant guy, right? Or has this already been pointed out??
Downvote troll farm account. [Post edited 12 Jul 2023 10:41]
|  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:41 - Jul 12 with 3559 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:36 - Jul 12 by Keno |
what debacle is that??
just out of interest if you want to buy a mars bar Ive got one you can have for £50 |
I know you've offered it to TB. But is it battered? | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:45 - Jul 12 with 3490 views | Keno |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:41 - Jul 12 by FrimleyBlue |
I know you've offered it to TB. But is it battered? |
It could be, but thats an extra £50 | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:48 - Jul 12 with 3450 views | TalkingBlues |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:28 - Jul 12 by jayessess |
Not sure how many times we need to go over FFP rules here.
The EFL caps the amount that clubs can spend relative to their revenue not relative to their owner's bank balance. |
Pretty sure we visited this stuff a few months ago and it was determined by those with greater knowledge on the subject, that the way the Pension mob were investing in the club meant that they could pump in as much as they wanted and the club were able to spend it, without attracting any FFP implications 🤷â€â™‚ï¸
That was League 1, could be different rules for Championship? But as the money was brought in before we were in the Championship, League 1 rules would apply I guess. | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:49 - Jul 12 with 3429 views | yorkshireblue |
I'm not sure you know double quotation marks mean do you? |  | | |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:50 - Jul 12 with 3414 views | TalkingBlues |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:28 - Jul 12 by StokieBlue |
The most surprising thing about this post is that you've successfully managed a currency conversion.
SB |
Thank you 😘 | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:50 - Jul 12 with 3412 views | SitfcB |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:36 - Jul 12 by Keno |
what debacle is that??
just out of interest if you want to buy a mars bar Ive got one you can have for £50 |
Piss off I can get one down the road for £20. [Post edited 12 Jul 2023 10:50]
| |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:51 - Jul 12 with 3402 views | TalkingBlues |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:32 - Jul 12 by FrimleyBlue |
Don't forget TB that a fair chunk of that input would be going on the pitch refurbs which is millions itself, let alone e the staples demolition. I'm sure ( but also guessing) that a large majority of it will also just be similar to M.Es input but much larger, to minimise the losses.
We aren't skint.
The pot has money. But we are still a loss making club so there's a lot of balancing to do. And £7 transfers isn't the way to do It. |
My understanding was that the initial £14 million’ish was paid to cover all those costs, the pitch, training ground, land next door etc [Post edited 12 Jul 2023 11:22]
| |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:52 - Jul 12 with 3379 views | Horsham |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:48 - Jul 12 by TalkingBlues |
Pretty sure we visited this stuff a few months ago and it was determined by those with greater knowledge on the subject, that the way the Pension mob were investing in the club meant that they could pump in as much as they wanted and the club were able to spend it, without attracting any FFP implications 🤷â€â™‚ï¸
That was League 1, could be different rules for Championship? But as the money was brought in before we were in the Championship, League 1 rules would apply I guess. |
The rules are different in the championship and the subject was dealt with in your other thread. | | | |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:54 - Jul 12 with 3346 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:48 - Jul 12 by TalkingBlues |
Pretty sure we visited this stuff a few months ago and it was determined by those with greater knowledge on the subject, that the way the Pension mob were investing in the club meant that they could pump in as much as they wanted and the club were able to spend it, without attracting any FFP implications 🤷â€â™‚ï¸
That was League 1, could be different rules for Championship? But as the money was brought in before we were in the Championship, League 1 rules would apply I guess. |
Not 'could be different rules' they are different rules for the championship. It will take you about 10 mins to read those rules and then you can up the level of your posts. | | | |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:54 - Jul 12 with 3341 views | TalkingBlues |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:45 - Jul 12 by Keno |
It could be, but thats an extra £50 |
I value a battered Mars Bar at £1.50 (give you £1 add on if I’m not sick afterwards) and that is my final offer 😀 | |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 10:57 - Jul 12 with 3306 views | homer_123 |
What debacle? |  |
| |
| Just revisiting the “Simms” debacle on 11:01 - Jul 12 with 3252 views | NthQldITFC |
Poisonous, negative, budgie? My sympathies.
Edit: add miserable, jealous? [Post edited 12 Jul 2023 11:06]
|  |
| # WE ARE STEALING THE FUTURE FROM OUR CHILDREN --- WE MUST CHANGE COURSE # | | Poll: | It's driving me nuts |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
