| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty 18:06 - May 19 with 1340 views | thebooks |
and get relegated on the final day at Portman Road next season.
We’ll have already won the league. |  | | |  |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:29 - May 19 with 1241 views | MattinLondon |
Nothing will happen to them. |  | | |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:47 - May 19 with 1193 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:29 - May 19 by MattinLondon |
Nothing will happen to them. |
Had this conversation earlier. Something is likely to HAVE to happen, or Forest, Everton and likely Leicester will take legal action. There is likely to be legal action from other clubs that stuck rigidly to FFP.
20 point deduction, reduced to 6 on appeal. |  |
| |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:55 - May 19 with 1154 views | Swansea_Blue |
More likely to get 65 penalties |  |
| |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 18:55 - May 19 with 1163 views | Bloots |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:47 - May 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Had this conversation earlier. Something is likely to HAVE to happen, or Forest, Everton and likely Leicester will take legal action. There is likely to be legal action from other clubs that stuck rigidly to FFP.
20 point deduction, reduced to 6 on appeal. |
....directly to FFP though, it's not a case of overspending.
Forest and Everton both published financial results that obviously broke FFP rules, they had no defence.
City's charges relate to how the financial results have been reported and whether they have been reported correctly. The PL claim they have incorrectly reported the figures, City's argument is that the PL haven't interpreted the figures correctly.
It's far more complicated than the other clubs you mention. |  |
| Enduringly lovable, intelligent and thunderingly exquisite. |
| |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 18:58 - May 19 with 1143 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 18:55 - May 19 by Bloots |
....directly to FFP though, it's not a case of overspending.
Forest and Everton both published financial results that obviously broke FFP rules, they had no defence.
City's charges relate to how the financial results have been reported and whether they have been reported correctly. The PL claim they have incorrectly reported the figures, City's argument is that the PL haven't interpreted the figures correctly.
It's far more complicated than the other clubs you mention. |
Could be wrong, but I could of sworn that there we're 3 charges of breaching FFP in there too??? | |
| |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 19:22 - May 19 with 1039 views | MattinLondon |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:47 - May 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Had this conversation earlier. Something is likely to HAVE to happen, or Forest, Everton and likely Leicester will take legal action. There is likely to be legal action from other clubs that stuck rigidly to FFP.
20 point deduction, reduced to 6 on appeal. |
I honesty don’t think anything will happen to them.
Their achievements will be tainted in the eyes of many fans - will City supporters care? Probably not unless it’s to develop more chips in their shoulders. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| That may well be the case.... on 19:28 - May 19 with 1008 views | Bloots |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 18:58 - May 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Could be wrong, but I could of sworn that there we're 3 charges of breaching FFP in there too??? |
....but inevitably it will depend on the outcome of the claims of irregular reporting.
The figures that City have reported show that they didn't fail FFP.
Whatever way you look at it it's much more complicated than the others....probably because City are making it more complicated.
I expect they end up getting found guilty of a charge or two relating to incorrect reporting, but not "financial doping" and as a result not get a "sporting penalty" but get a fine.
Inevitable really. | |
| Enduringly lovable, intelligent and thunderingly exquisite. |
| |
| Goodness, I actually think it's worse.... on 19:51 - May 19 with 952 views | Ftnfwest |
| Goodness, I actually think it's worse.... on 19:25 - May 19 by Bloots |
....that they are congratulating a manager on choosing to leave his highly paid job.
"I think we will all miss him"
TRANSLATED
"I literally couldn't give a toss about who manages Liverpool" |
I will say this, for someone who started off by saying this is embarrassing and not all about me, he didn’t half go on about himself. |  | | |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 20:20 - May 19 with 864 views | ArnieM |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 18:55 - May 19 by Bloots |
....directly to FFP though, it's not a case of overspending.
Forest and Everton both published financial results that obviously broke FFP rules, they had no defence.
City's charges relate to how the financial results have been reported and whether they have been reported correctly. The PL claim they have incorrectly reported the figures, City's argument is that the PL haven't interpreted the figures correctly.
It's far more complicated than the other clubs you mention. |
I can’t see how in earth they haven’t over spent, can you ….. or anyone ? |  |
| |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 20:22 - May 19 with 849 views | American_ITFC |
I have a better chance of Margot Robbie showing up to my house naked tomorrow morning declaring her love for me than City getting a huge penalty, or much of a penalty at all. |  |
| |
| Chelsea, Man Utd, Arsenal.... on 20:24 - May 19 with 835 views | Bloots |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 20:20 - May 19 by ArnieM |
I can’t see how in earth they haven’t over spent, can you ….. or anyone ? |
...Newcastle and Spurs all have a higher net spend (transfers) over the last 5 years than City do. | |
| Enduringly lovable, intelligent and thunderingly exquisite. |
| |
| Sadly all their dubious “non footballing budget payments” were done before… on 20:33 - May 19 with 800 views | unstableblue |
… things got truly tightened up. And as I understand their incoming mega deduction is not actually going to happen.
So effectively they made it to the top of the tree illegally. And now their mega revenue means they can do it legally.
Ultimately we need Pep to leave and for them to make a poor managerial appointment.
I think the Arse, Liverpool and Man City leadership of the Prem will go on for some time. Until say a Man U or a Chelsea get their sh!t together.
Newcastle are under the new rules and are struggling to buy the title. [Post edited 19 May 20:37]
|  |
| |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 20:37 - May 19 with 777 views | MK1 |
| The charges against City don't relate.... on 20:20 - May 19 by ArnieM |
I can’t see how in earth they haven’t over spent, can you ….. or anyone ? |
If you look at their spending compared to others like Chelsea, Tottenham and Man Utd, then they really haven't spent as much as people think. It's a lot, but not as much as others. They have just brought better players at better prices than others. |  | | |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 20:52 - May 19 with 702 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:47 - May 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Had this conversation earlier. Something is likely to HAVE to happen, or Forest, Everton and likely Leicester will take legal action. There is likely to be legal action from other clubs that stuck rigidly to FFP.
20 point deduction, reduced to 6 on appeal. |
Completely different case and rules. |  |
| |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 20:54 - May 19 with 691 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 19:22 - May 19 by MattinLondon |
I honesty don’t think anything will happen to them.
Their achievements will be tainted in the eyes of many fans - will City supporters care? Probably not unless it’s to develop more chips in their shoulders. |
They won't care, especially if not found guilty of anything!! | |
| |
| That may well be the case.... on 08:14 - May 20 with 429 views | Pinewoodblue |
| That may well be the case.... on 19:28 - May 19 by Bloots |
....but inevitably it will depend on the outcome of the claims of irregular reporting.
The figures that City have reported show that they didn't fail FFP.
Whatever way you look at it it's much more complicated than the others....probably because City are making it more complicated.
I expect they end up getting found guilty of a charge or two relating to incorrect reporting, but not "financial doping" and as a result not get a "sporting penalty" but get a fine.
Inevitable really. |
A hefty fine maybe a bad thing for Ipswich, depending on what EPL do with it. Can see them gifting it to clubs who were members of EPL in the years the offences were committed.
Which places us at a financial disadvantage. |  |
| |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 08:26 - May 20 with 398 views | cvillageblue |
| Hopefully Citeh will have a 65 point penalty on 18:47 - May 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Had this conversation earlier. Something is likely to HAVE to happen, or Forest, Everton and likely Leicester will take legal action. There is likely to be legal action from other clubs that stuck rigidly to FFP.
20 point deduction, reduced to 6 on appeal. |
I genuinely believe if proven then they will get relegated. (If a significant amount of the charges are proven)
As has been said other clubs have had a points deducted and the credibility of the global Premier League is at stake,
Happened to Juventus.
Happened to Saracens in rugby. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
