Chill out guys 20:45 - Jan 24 with 905 views | Marshalls_Mullet | There's no way the club would have responded any differently at this juncture. It's the old hollow vote of confidence. Lambert will be gone by the end of the week. | |
| | |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 with 859 views | Coco | No way Evans would sanction two loans then sack him. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 with 862 views | chrismakin | Was there any need for a reply statement? all it does is just remind everyone how pathetic Evans is and it's another statement of support Just ignoring the paper is usually what clubs do | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 with 858 views | J2BLUE | Doubt it. The statement was obviously expected. The wording has pissed a lot of people off. Like it was written by a teacher on your year 3 homework. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 with 854 views | gainsboroughblue | This is also Marcus Evans. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:47 - Jan 24 with 840 views | George25 | Yes. Otherwise EADT would of not published it, especially when they have held off for a while because they don’t want to ruin the papers reputation. [Post edited 24 Jan 2021 20:48]
| | | |
Chill out guys on 20:54 - Jan 24 with 700 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 by Coco | No way Evans would sanction two loans then sack him. |
Of course he would. It's not exactly breaking the transfer record! | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:56 - Jan 24 with 658 views | pointofblue |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 by Coco | No way Evans would sanction two loans then sack him. |
As I said elsewhere I wouldn't be entrirely surprised if someone else agreed to those signings. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:56 - Jan 24 with 655 views | homer_123 | Would you put your house on it? | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Chill out guys on 20:57 - Jan 24 with 635 views | gainsboroughblue | Regardless of the response, to allow things to have got to this stage is negligence in itself so fans are still going to be low in confidence that anything will change. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 20:59 - Jan 24 with 608 views | gordon |
Chill out guys on 20:57 - Jan 24 by gainsboroughblue | Regardless of the response, to allow things to have got to this stage is negligence in itself so fans are still going to be low in confidence that anything will change. |
The thing is that this time Evans has had a big say in the playing style, tactics and team selection, so he owns the failure too - that's why it's dragged on for so long. | | | |
Chill out guys on 21:00 - Jan 24 with 597 views | jayessess |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 by J2BLUE | Doubt it. The statement was obviously expected. The wording has pissed a lot of people off. Like it was written by a teacher on your year 3 homework. |
I don't think there is a wording for "we still think this is going to turn out alright" which wouldn't have been annoying, to be fair to them. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 21:03 - Jan 24 with 544 views | J2BLUE |
Chill out guys on 21:00 - Jan 24 by jayessess | I don't think there is a wording for "we still think this is going to turn out alright" which wouldn't have been annoying, to be fair to them. |
They could have just said "Paul Lambert retains the full support of the club". It would have been annoying but not insulting like that statement. | |
| |
Chill out guys on 21:50 - Jan 24 with 394 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Chill out guys on 20:46 - Jan 24 by Coco | No way Evans would sanction two loans then sack him. |
What, like he didn't sanction the massive wages for Gio before sacking Jim? | |
| |
| |