| Question 19:42 - Jul 25 with 789 views | gtsb1966 |
Was watching a program on the crime channel and was wondering how many people would gladly have their DNA on file. So many crimes are repeated and could be solved with a DNA database of everyone I'm just wondering who would object to it and why. It's something that sounds so simple yet hasn't been done. Should it be law ? |  | | |  |
| Question on 19:45 - Jul 25 with 762 views | MattinLondon |
Think there are privacy issues such as why should the state have information like that about the individual.
Aldo, once a criminal has paid their debt to society why should they be treated any differently from other members of society. |  | | |
| Question on 19:49 - Jul 25 with 748 views | MerseyBlue |
Part of me thinks I'd be alright with that, as you say, it would be an invaluable resource to efficiently solve crimes. Another part of me thinks absolutely not. I could envisage a situation where the randomness of the universe could put you at the centre of a crime that you know nothing about. In a world where everyone's DNA is on file, you could see policing being lazier and the burden of proof pushed more onto the defendant. |  |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Question on 19:54 - Jul 25 with 726 views | J2BLUE |
| Question on 19:49 - Jul 25 by MerseyBlue |
Part of me thinks I'd be alright with that, as you say, it would be an invaluable resource to efficiently solve crimes. Another part of me thinks absolutely not. I could envisage a situation where the randomness of the universe could put you at the centre of a crime that you know nothing about. In a world where everyone's DNA is on file, you could see policing being lazier and the burden of proof pushed more onto the defendant. |
Yep there's a reason no country does this. |  |
| |
| Question on 19:58 - Jul 25 with 714 views | MerseyBlue |
| Question on 19:54 - Jul 25 by J2BLUE |
Yep there's a reason no country does this. |
Yeah I think when you really consider it, the cons massively outweigh the pros. Being falsely imprisoned must surely be one of the hardest things a person could be put through. | |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Question on 20:02 - Jul 25 with 693 views | gtsb1966 |
| Question on 19:49 - Jul 25 by MerseyBlue |
Part of me thinks I'd be alright with that, as you say, it would be an invaluable resource to efficiently solve crimes. Another part of me thinks absolutely not. I could envisage a situation where the randomness of the universe could put you at the centre of a crime that you know nothing about. In a world where everyone's DNA is on file, you could see policing being lazier and the burden of proof pushed more onto the defendant. |
Didn't think of that. Could be a valuable tool though when combined with CCTV etc | | | |
| Question on 20:10 - Jul 25 with 661 views | MerseyBlue |
| Question on 20:02 - Jul 25 by gtsb1966 |
Didn't think of that. Could be a valuable tool though when combined with CCTV etc |
Yeah, if you imagine a system where everything is above board and no shortcuts are taken, it would be great in instances such as that. Unfortunately, given all the dodgy things we know have gone on in the past, it would be hard to trust that things would be done right. | |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Question on 20:33 - Jul 25 with 635 views | factual_blue |
| Question on 19:49 - Jul 25 by MerseyBlue |
Part of me thinks I'd be alright with that, as you say, it would be an invaluable resource to efficiently solve crimes. Another part of me thinks absolutely not. I could envisage a situation where the randomness of the universe could put you at the centre of a crime that you know nothing about. In a world where everyone's DNA is on file, you could see policing being lazier and the burden of proof pushed more onto the defendant. |
Google The Phantom of Heilbronn |  |
| |
| Question on 21:08 - Jul 25 with 577 views | Seablu |
No.
Then again, Midsomer Murders would only last 5 mins..
Go on then, I’m in. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Question on 21:10 - Jul 25 with 575 views | MerseyBlue |
| Question on 20:33 - Jul 25 by factual_blue |
Google The Phantom of Heilbronn |
That is pretty wild, it vaguely rings a bell but I might be thinking of a plot from a film or something. | |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Question on 22:01 - Jul 25 with 529 views | factual_blue |
| Question on 21:10 - Jul 25 by MerseyBlue |
That is pretty wild, it vaguely rings a bell but I might be thinking of a plot from a film or something. |
I think that contamination scenario has been used in both CSI and Silent Witness. | |
| |
| Question on 22:26 - Jul 25 with 509 views | MerseyBlue |
| Question on 22:01 - Jul 25 by factual_blue |
I think that contamination scenario has been used in both CSI and Silent Witness. |
Ahh Silent Witness sounds like it might be the one | |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
