Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling 19:23 - Jan 26 with 941 viewsbluelagos

Some very salient points for those who criticise the various CV models.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/26/mathematicians-covid-proje

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

3
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 20:32 - Jan 26 with 837 viewsCotty

Kit is great. Ultra nice bloke too!

Not sure the same can be said of Ferguson.
[Post edited 26 Jan 2022 20:33]
0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 20:44 - Jan 26 with 789 viewsbluelagos

Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 20:32 - Jan 26 by Cotty

Kit is great. Ultra nice bloke too!

Not sure the same can be said of Ferguson.
[Post edited 26 Jan 2022 20:33]


Do you lecture disease modelling?

I studied it as part of the mathematical modelling part of my degree, but that was 30 years ago. Read up a bit on the current models and the basics are unchanged, computer power is defo the biggest change from what I can see making the number of inputs much larger am sure and the complexity off the scale compared to what I learned.

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 21:09 - Jan 26 with 738 viewsvilanovablue

The point about modelling being taken out of context and misused is very relevant. I'd also say that computers are much faster but the variables are so massive it's an impossible job.
0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 21:57 - Jan 26 with 673 viewsCotty

Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 20:44 - Jan 26 by bluelagos

Do you lecture disease modelling?

I studied it as part of the mathematical modelling part of my degree, but that was 30 years ago. Read up a bit on the current models and the basics are unchanged, computer power is defo the biggest change from what I can see making the number of inputs much larger am sure and the complexity off the scale compared to what I learned.


I teach an MSc course with some (pretty basic) epidemiological modelling with uncertainty.
0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 22:04 - Jan 26 with 657 viewsfactual_blue

Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 21:57 - Jan 26 by Cotty

I teach an MSc course with some (pretty basic) epidemiological modelling with uncertainty.


Surely if you teach with uncertainty your students won't have any confidence in what you say?

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Do you grind your gears
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

5
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 22:08 - Jan 26 with 632 viewsEwan_Oozami

Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 21:57 - Jan 26 by Cotty

I teach an MSc course with some (pretty basic) epidemiological modelling with uncertainty.


Your name's not Vroomfondel is it?

Just one small problem; sell their houses to who, Ben? Fcking Aquaman?
Poll: What else could go on top of the cake apart from icing and a cherry?

0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 22:42 - Jan 26 with 590 viewsTrequartista

Are we on 4 million cases a day yet or 8 million? I can't keep up.

On a less sarcastic note though, I don't feel it is the mathematical models that are at fault, i just feel there are too many unknowns in the variables going into them to make them of any value or accuracy. When the estimates are made for the unknown variables, they are always pessimistic.

Take Whitty's comment of everything we know about Omicron is bad. From what we saw in South Africa, it was fairly clear, but not proven against a UK cohort, that Omicron would be more transmissible, and it was fairly clear, but not proven, that Omicron would be virulent against a UK cohort. Yet he was only willing to accept the pessimistic data and not the optimistic data.

Sure, it's always good to err on the side of caution, but there is a cost of continually overestimating things. You will remind me i have no qualifications or initials after my name but Dr Raghib Ali MD(Epi) MPH FRCP (UK), Clinical Epidemiologist at Cambridge University does and he today claims plan B restrictions haven't made "any significant difference to outcomes, with death rates across home nations not differing since July 19 (England is in fact lower than Wales & Scotland)"

I view these mathematical models with the same scepticism as opinion polls and long-range weather forecasts. Guesswork.
[Post edited 26 Jan 2022 22:43]

Poll: Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

0
Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 23:32 - Jan 26 with 526 viewsBlueBadger

Food for thought on the Pandemic modelling on 22:04 - Jan 26 by factual_blue

Surely if you teach with uncertainty your students won't have any confidence in what you say?


I've taught on the shop floor with a certain amount of uncertainty for over 20 years and several of my students are now sisters, charge nurses, specialist nurses, mangers and matron now, if that helps.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024