| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) 12:46 - Apr 1 with 1634 views | unstableblue |
.... I've just got all our rivals games up on screen at the same time...
And our rivals (Wycombe, Sunderland, Oxford and Sheff Weds).... not only do they have to play each other (and Rotherham, Plymouth and MK Dons) but the majority of remaining teams they play include the relegation teams - Gills, Fleetwood, Wimbledon, Morecombe, Donny.
Oxford only play teams from (listed) above
Wycombe only play team above bar 2 games (burton, cambridge)
Sunderland only play teams above bar 2 games (Shrews, cambridge)
Sheff Weds only play teams above bar (Bolton (away!), Crewe)
[Post edited 1 Apr 2022 12:55]
|  |
| |  |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 12:50 - Apr 1 with 1549 views | Dubtractor |
You're going to have to try that again mate. |  |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:51 - Apr 1 with 1530 views | Dyland |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 12:50 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
You're going to have to try that again mate. |
|  |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:55 - Apr 1 with 1485 views | Dubtractor |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:51 - Apr 1 by Dyland |
|
Glad it's not just me who was struggling with it! | |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:56 - Apr 1 with 1467 views | unstableblue |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:55 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
Glad it's not just me who was struggling with it! |
By adding teams ‘listed’ above… does that help?
How can I clarify Dubster?
In summary - all our rivals (in the main) okay teams fighting for something | |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:58 - Apr 1 with 1441 views | Dubtractor |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:56 - Apr 1 by unstableblue |
By adding teams ‘listed’ above… does that help?
How can I clarify Dubster?
In summary - all our rivals (in the main) okay teams fighting for something |
Those small changes make all the difference, it makes sense now! | |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:59 - Apr 1 with 1439 views | Dyland |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:56 - Apr 1 by unstableblue |
By adding teams ‘listed’ above… does that help?
How can I clarify Dubster?
In summary - all our rivals (in the main) okay teams fighting for something |
Adding 'listed above' certainly helps. Before it read they only played teams above them in the table... er, and ones at the bottom ;) | |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:09 - Apr 1 with 1382 views | unstableblue |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:58 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
Those small changes make all the difference, it makes sense now! |
Now BELIEVE!!!
(Disclaimer - the fact that those relegation teams couldn’t see a win even if it slapped them in the face, is a minor detail (eeeek) | |
| |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 13:11 - Apr 1 with 1369 views | J2BLUE |
It's going to blow your mind when you work out how leagues work and that some of those games they might away from home. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:18 - Apr 1 with 1306 views | BlueBadger |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 12:55 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
Glad it's not just me who was struggling with it! |
We are probably less than 10 minutes away from the random use of the word 'technical' or the phrase 'breaking the lines'. |  |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:20 - Apr 1 with 1290 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:18 - Apr 1 by BlueBadger |
We are probably less than 10 minutes away from the random use of the word 'technical' or the phrase 'breaking the lines'. |
I did mention "periodization" once today (now twice) but I think I got away with it.... |  |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:32 - Apr 1 with 1174 views | unstableblue |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:18 - Apr 1 by BlueBadger |
We are probably less than 10 minutes away from the random use of the word 'technical' or the phrase 'breaking the lines'. |
Hmmmm - what was that word McKenna keeps using?! | |
| |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 13:36 - Apr 1 with 1127 views | unstableblue |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 13:11 - Apr 1 by J2BLUE |
It's going to blow your mind when you work out how leagues work and that some of those games they might away from home. |
Yes because I was being serious
(Nice avatar... (plagiarist)) | |
| |
| HANG ON A FRICKIN MINUTE..... (play-offs) on 13:39 - Apr 1 with 1096 views | Charlie_pl_baxter |
Plymouth's games look to be fairly critical as they are too far in front for us to catch and they play Oxford, Sunderland and Wycombe. For my money the most likely to drop points in order are:
Oxford - 4 games against top 6 (including 1 against top 2)
Sunderland - 3 games against top 6 (including 1 against top 2)
Sheff Wed - 2 games against top six (including 1 against top 2)
Wycombe - 2 games against top 6 |  |
| |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 15:17 - Apr 1 with 849 views | HighgateBlue |
| the second paragraph makes literally no sense (n/t) on 13:09 - Apr 1 by unstableblue |
Now BELIEVE!!!
(Disclaimer - the fact that those relegation teams couldn’t see a win even if it slapped them in the face, is a minor detail (eeeek) |
Well they are in and around the relegation for a reason, aren't they? I don't think that really needs to be a disclaimer - we all know that teams towards the bottom of the table have markedly worse records than those towards the top... |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
