Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Ipswich Town 1 v 1 Millwall
EFL Championship
Saturday, 21st March 2026 Kick-off 12:30
Millwall Boss: We Went Double-Aggressive After the Break
Saturday, 21st Mar 2026 16:41

Millwall boss Alex Neil revealed Town going ahead through Jack Clarke just before the break was made his mind up to make changes at half-time, the Lions coming back to level through Josh Coburn five minutes after the restart to claim a 1-1 draw.

The result sees the third-placed Blues remain ahead of the South Londoners on goal difference but with a game in hand. Town stay two points off Middlesbrough in second after Boro were held to a 0-0 draw at Blackburn.

Neil admitted his team were very much second best before the break: “First half, I thought Ipswich were good. I thought they moved the ball really well.

“I didn’t think we got a foothold in the game, we were a bit panicky, we didn’t move the ball well.

“We pressed the way we normally press but, to be fair to them, I knew they were going to work on a lot of rotations to try and free-up that spare player in the middle and they found them more often than not.

“What I will say, though, they scored the goal but I think Patt [Anthony Patterson] makes one other good save, but other than that there weren’t loads of chances.

“But I thought, certainly if anybody was going to score, it was going to be them rather than us.

“We had a couple of little bits, Camiel [Neghli] went down the left with a shot. I think we had a shot from the right, but I wasn’t best pleased at half-time. I thought they played better and we needed to do something to get back in the game.

“The goal was the catalyst, really. If it was 0-0, I don’t know what I would have done at that point, but when they scored, we needed to do something to try and get ourselves back into the game.

“We went double-aggressive on it, went one-for-one all over the pitch and at that point one of two things are always going to happen - we’ll get the next goal and get back into it and we might go on and win it, or it could get a little bit messy and it’s going to be a long afternoon.

“Thankfully for me, I thought the players fully committed to it, they were aggressive, they went after the ball and in the transitional moments, albeit I thought they carried a threat, but equally so did we, whereas in the first half, I thought they carried a threat and we didn’t really, so the game wasn’t really ever going to fall in our favour from that point of view.

“What we did do, and this is what I want to make clear, because we took Mac [Macaulay Langstaff] off [at half-time] and brought Mich [Mihailo Ivanovic] on, the game doesn’t change on that, the game changed because we changed our press.

“I could have kept Mac on but if you’re going to play two up front, you’re going to put the ball forward and physical presence matters, and that’s why I made the change.

“And equally, I thought once we got the goal, we had a few opportunities at the end to get the winner and were a bit unfortunate with the one [from Ivanovic] that came off the bar.

“But certainly at half-time, if you offered me a point, I would have taken it at that stage.”

Regarding Town, Neil added: “What I will say is that Ipswich are the best team at home in the division. They’ve got an unbelievable squad, they bring a lot of really good, strong players on.

“But I thought in the second half our lads more than matched that, hence the reason why we managed to get a result.

“It’s certainly not to be sniffed at, coming here and getting a good result because they’ve got a really strong squad.”

Photo: TWTD



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



Bert added 16:49 - Mar 21
A very fair and objective summary.
9

Bazza8564 added 16:58 - Mar 21
Yes Bert, can't disagree with you. Tactically and physically Millwall adjusted and probably deserved their point.
Our football at times was sublime, but with injuries and suspensions, for the first time this season we looked a little stretched in terms of adding from the bench. Taylor did OK, but I didn't think any of the subs upped the level of those they replaced. Prhaps the break is coming at the right time for us?
4

blueboy1981 added 17:01 - Mar 21
In other words you taught the ‘One Trick Pony’ another trick - but I doubt it registered, sadly !
-11

yorkieblue62 added 17:24 - Mar 21
Plenty of other clubs supporters have described Alex Neill as a one trick pony in the past.
2

jas0999 added 17:37 - Mar 21
I’m afraid Alex had far too much for Kieran who seemingly had absolutely no idea how to counter it. We went from looking good to looking really poor. Lucky to get a point. Worrying. KM is being paid a huge salary to adapt to things like this and on multiple occasions this season he hasn’t been able to. Disappointing.
1

armchaircritic59 added 18:36 - Mar 21
Absolutely bang on summing up from AN. I keep saying it this season, but apart from the very ocassional whinge fest, a lot of common sense and honesty from opposing managers this season post match. PL please take note.

0

churchmans added 18:48 - Mar 21
We where lucky to get a point in the end!
1

atty added 20:58 - Mar 21
“first 60 minutes we were the better team”, Behave that first half was all Town. Ex budgies eh?
0

Tractorboy1985 added 21:33 - Mar 21
And it pains me to say it Mr Neil you were more than worthy of a point after your tactical switch which our manager failed to adapt to and sadly we just change personnel not a formation when things arent going right! What sort of half time team talk was that? Once again 1 half Town! Possibly our finest performance all season first half including Coventry! We pressed.. we were quick with our passing.. they couldn’t get near us.. fast forward 2nd half… are we arrogant?? Millwall came at us and we folded! Substitutions horrific bar Jack Taylor who instilled bite however still frustrated when he should have tw@tted the thing knowing how good he can strike a ball! This league is garbage! We rolled over the run away leaders twice but are failing to beat the dross! Our last TEAM would have rolled those bunch of cloggers! We are just a load of overpaid individuals who don’t have the same balls to cope with a promotion push! On certain occasions we are seeing ITFC move forward (loved Morsy but Matiswa an unbelievable upgrade) but spend 12 mill on McAteer and 17 on Walle and Burns at 400k is still our best option…. Money ruined the game.. we have tried to run before we can walk and ripped up a TEAM.. chucked a load of money at it and ain’t no better off! Quality of player better maybe.. but not the care and determination! Off to bed… playoffs it is.. hope im wrong! COYB
-1

AndySav04 added 21:54 - Mar 21
Think what we paid for is what we got in players. A lot of nice guys and not much other

Great amount of talent, especially on the left flank. Now that Philogene is back.
Can go the full 90 mins and rotate the great JC in later.

All good, as a few players have not YET found the feet in spite of being at the club.all season.
0

poet added 07:49 - Mar 22
A few people on this site think that Neil outwitted McKenna in the second half!
I beg to differ. I believe what actually happened was that Neil thought his lumbering lumps could actually go toe to toe with McKenna’s players at playing football. He obviously realised that he’d made a gross miscalculation. His players soon found out that they were out of their depth. He was lucky that they were only one goal down at HT. In reality, considering the many chances we created, and how we totally dominated proceedings, it really should have been at least 3-0. That would have put the game to bed.

So at halftime the tactical genius comes up with the cunning plan to go “double-aggressive on it”. Breathtaking.
His second half tactics, all be it bereft of resembling much football, sadly proved dividends. However, we still created enough opportunities to have scored the winning goal in that half. Alas, the bottom line is, we were our own worst enemy. Thanks to him over estimating his players abilities, we really should have put his boys to bed in the first half. So I feel, he got away with one yesterday.
3

Jugsy added 18:31 - Mar 22
It’s the business end of the season when teams can throw a bit of caution to the wind, that’s what Millwall ended up doing. The pressure is on our boys unfortunately, that’s an unfair advantage for others where they’ve over performed, like Millwall and just like we did two seasons ago. Recall us beating Southampton 3-2, big parts of that match we were out at sea, they had the expensive players and expectation, and we did them.

It was a great game with plenty of ifs buts and maybes. If we’d picked the better option on those counter attacks in the second half, we’d be home and hosed. Maybe the pressure told in this one. But we’re still very much in this race. Nothing lost, nothing gained, still in our hands. That’s all that mattered from this result. COYB!!!
0

armchaircritic59 added 00:58 - Mar 23
Poet, I don't know what you're taking, but I'd seriously advise you to stop doing it, it's badly effecting your eyesight. Taking off the blue tinted spectacles wouldn't hurt either.
-1

poet added 06:41 - Mar 23
armchaircritic59
This site is for those that have opinions on football matches played by ITFC and their opponents, not for those that would attempt to seek some sort of recognition by attempting to sound clever, by making personal remarks.
Your attempt in doing so only shows your ineptitude to post opinions on the subject matter. In short, don’t be so willing to show your benightedness.
0

PortmanTerrorist added 07:33 - Mar 23
Fair assessment. But don't get the negative comments McKenna. The opportunities were there for us in second half but the players couldn't make a pass. Our final pass was shocking all day, had it not been we would have been out of sight. There are tactics and there is just passing better.
0

PortmanTerrorist added 07:33 - Mar 23
Fair assessment. But don't get the negative comments McKenna. The opportunities were there for us in second half but the players couldn't make a pass. Our final pass was shocking all day, had it not been we would have been out of sight. There are tactics and there is just passing better.
0

Jugsy added 11:07 - Mar 23
Steady armchaircritic59... that's a bit punchy for a post that was far from divisive. I lean more towards Poet's view and most views on here re the performance are aligning to large degree.
0

armchaircritic59 added 18:37 - Mar 23
Jugsy, that's fair enough, I have no problem with that, it's opinions. However trying to make out that Millwall are a " bunch of lumbering lumps ", and his players " soon found out they were out of their depth " are way over the top comments. Yes we were far and away the better side in the first half, extremely evident. They were clearly the better the side in the 2nd. Changed personal and tactics at half time to which we didn't have much of answer. Couple that with the fortunate escape at the death from having the underside of the crossbar rattled. You may ask why we didn't react to their change, I have. All in all we failed to beat a team of lumbering lumps who were out of their depth it appears. I think that might say more about us than Millwall, unfortunately. I think there's a very simple explanation for the events of the match. KM got his set up and tactics spot on in the first half, Aex Neil certainly didn't. In the 2nd half it was role reversal. Honours even you might say.
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 298 bloggers

Ipswich Town Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026