By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Loans are fine if they are a view to a permanent move, or if it is someone who we would never be able to be able to buy (i.e. Dos Santos).
A Loan of a player who is not better than ones we already have is what I gt fed up with (or is an older player who stops our younger player having more games).
Loans are fine if they are a view to a permanent move, or if it is someone who we would never be able to be able to buy (i.e. Dos Santos).
A Loan of a player who is not better than ones we already have is what I gt fed up with (or is an older player who stops our younger player having more games).
What about as cover for a position or for an injury? What about instead of buying a new cm because bishop will be back and Dozzell will have gained more experience?
Are we still ignoring the fact that Dozzell is not ready and blaming mm?
Yep unless its with a view to a move. it lacks ambition and keeps out young talent at the club. understand in extreme cases with a plethora of injuries but when you get a situation like we have with Lawrence clearly our best player and you know we wont be able to sign him its all rather negative.
Yep unless its with a view to a move. it lacks ambition and keeps out young talent at the club. understand in extreme cases with a plethora of injuries but when you get a situation like we have with Lawrence clearly our best player and you know we wont be able to sign him its all rather negative.
Indeed and the same as last year with Frazer .Plus if we sign another out of our budget striker now, just to get us through to the next transfer window! just seems the papering over cracks just keeps on coming.