Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) 16:24 - Feb 26 with 585 views | Mr_Ipswich | | | | | |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:25 - Feb 26 with 559 views | jeera | If you think the scoreline is down to those two alone... | |
| |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:26 - Feb 26 with 532 views | Illinoisblue | Nothing wrong with Bakinson. Thompson no better than Penney | |
| |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:27 - Feb 26 with 510 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:26 - Feb 26 by Illinoisblue | Nothing wrong with Bakinson. Thompson no better than Penney |
Agree with that assessment. Think Bakinson has had a pretty decent game. | | | |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:28 - Feb 26 with 477 views | JDB23 | Not sure I’d say too much against Bakinson, slightly different to what we already have and adds more depth. Thompson however is dreadful, especially in this system. Swindon is definitely his level. | | | |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:29 - Feb 26 with 452 views | Schmoke | Tell us why... | | | |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:30 - Feb 26 with 436 views | gordon | Agree with this generally - Bakinson is OK sometimes but no better than other options, but Thompson is nowhere near Penney or KVY in that position, he's really poor. | | | |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:31 - Feb 26 with 416 views | Rjitfc | Bakinson has had a decent game Thompson, I really dont see what he offers that Penney doesn't. Nowhere near as threatening going forward and no better in defence. [Post edited 26 Feb 2022 16:32]
| |
| |
| |