| West Brom subs? 14:20 - Feb 10 with 1623 views | Portman_Pie |
Haven’t West Brom just made a fourth seperate substitution?
Am I missing something?
|  | | |  |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 with 1598 views | Swansea_Blue |
1st one was at half time wan't it? You get an extra one at half time for some unexplainable reason. |  |
| |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 with 1586 views | Portman_Pie |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 by Swansea_Blue |
1st one was at half time wan't it? You get an extra one at half time for some unexplainable reason. |
Didn’t know this was the case.. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:24 - Feb 10 with 1558 views | EastboundSplinter |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 by Swansea_Blue |
1st one was at half time wan't it? You get an extra one at half time for some unexplainable reason. |
They’ve made 4 separate changes outside of half-time according to Sky Sports. |  | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:32 - Feb 10 with 1517 views | redrickstuhaart |
| West Brom subs? on 14:24 - Feb 10 by EastboundSplinter |
They’ve made 4 separate changes outside of half-time according to Sky Sports. |
Should forfeit the game then. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:42 - Feb 10 with 1436 views | redrickstuhaart |
| West Brom subs? on 14:32 - Feb 10 by redrickstuhaart |
Should forfeit the game then. |
Actually half serious here. Looking at the game stats, they did 4 separate subs in the second half. Two are only a minute apart, but I dont remember it being a double one when Dikes came off.
That is an unfair advantage and there should be a strict penalty- same as there would be for playing someone ineligible. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:42 - Feb 10 with 1430 views | EastboundSplinter |
| West Brom subs? on 14:32 - Feb 10 by redrickstuhaart |
Should forfeit the game then. |
Where did you find that rule? | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:43 - Feb 10 with 1417 views | redrickstuhaart |
Read the thread. [Post edited 10 Feb 14:44]
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| West Brom subs? on 14:43 - Feb 10 with 1416 views | redrickstuhaart |
Div listed. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:55 - Feb 10 with 1355 views | Daninthecampo |
They made a double substitution | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 14:58 - Feb 10 with 1313 views | EastboundSplinter |
| West Brom subs? on 14:43 - Feb 10 by redrickstuhaart |
Read the thread. [Post edited 10 Feb 14:44]
|
There’s no indication of any rules which would result in a forfeit of the match in this thread.
The EFL competition rules don’t specify a sanction either. It’d go to a tribunal but it’d be fairly unprecedented for them to award the result to us. More likely would be that the referee receives a sanction and the result stands.
I suspect that they will chalk it up to the changes listed on 55’ and 56’ being during the same stoppage in play with the lengthy injury taken into account. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 15:06 - Feb 10 with 1232 views | Tangledupin_Blue |
| West Brom subs? on 14:42 - Feb 10 by redrickstuhaart |
Actually half serious here. Looking at the game stats, they did 4 separate subs in the second half. Two are only a minute apart, but I dont remember it being a double one when Dikes came off.
That is an unfair advantage and there should be a strict penalty- same as there would be for playing someone ineligible. |
The two substitutions were in the same subsituation break. By the time the linesman has checked studs of the first sub and fourth official changes the number on the board for the second it has ticked from 55th minute to 56th but it is the same break. Often happens that way. [Post edited 10 Feb 16:14]
|  |
| |
| West Brom subs? on 15:07 - Feb 10 with 1226 views | redrickstuhaart |
| West Brom subs? on 15:06 - Feb 10 by Tangledupin_Blue |
The two substitutions were in the same subsituation break. By the time the linesman has checked studs of the first sub and fourth official changes the number on the board for the second it has ticked from 55th minute to 56th but it is the same break. Often happens that way. [Post edited 10 Feb 16:14]
|
If thats right then fair enough, of course.
Not how I remember it, as Dike was replaced injured. But may well be correct. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 15:10 - Feb 10 with 1193 views | EastboundSplinter |
| West Brom subs? on 15:07 - Feb 10 by redrickstuhaart |
If thats right then fair enough, of course.
Not how I remember it, as Dike was replaced injured. But may well be correct. |
Div listed. | | | |
| West Brom subs? on 15:18 - Feb 10 with 1132 views | Radlett_blue |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 by Swansea_Blue |
1st one was at half time wan't it? You get an extra one at half time for some unexplainable reason. |
THe one at half time doesn't disrupt the game. The point of the rule was to stop teams wasting time by making five separate substitutions. |  |
| |
| West Brom subs? on 15:24 - Feb 10 with 1100 views | pointofblue |
Half time doesn't count, as it doesn't result in time wasting or break up in play. So...
X - Chalobah for Bartley at half time
1 - Johnston and Dike for Fellows and Thomas-Asante (55/56)
2 - Swift for Dike (65)
3 - Pipa for Weimann (83) | |
| |
| West Brom subs? on 22:17 - Feb 10 with 879 views | Sharkey |
| West Brom subs? on 14:22 - Feb 10 by Swansea_Blue |
1st one was at half time wan't it? You get an extra one at half time for some unexplainable reason. |
Inexplicable? It was clearly explained. It doesn’t disrupt the game. It’s sensible. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
