All our club needs us a quick conversation 10:29 - Jan 22 with 790 views | Bluefish | Between mick and Marcus where Marcus tells mick to sort the playing style out and have more faith in the youngsters between now and may or he is out of a job. Simple Of and probably worth mentioning to never pick Dougie again because it upsets the fans To he fair he has been trying to do these things recently but it hasn't necessarily worked and hasn't been consistent enough. Maybe the chat already took place? | |
| | |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:37 - Jan 22 with 761 views | blueblueburleymcgrew | if your final paragraph is correct then Marcus needs to call him back and say sorry Mick gave you a chance but it doesn't seem to be working so this might be a good time to go our separate ways. | | | |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:41 - Jan 22 with 725 views | Bluefish |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:37 - Jan 22 by blueblueburleymcgrew | if your final paragraph is correct then Marcus needs to call him back and say sorry Mick gave you a chance but it doesn't seem to be working so this might be a good time to go our separate ways. |
So mick is told to play more youngsters and change the style but because we then lose he has to go immediately? That doesn't make sense | |
| |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:41 - Jan 22 with 730 views | Guthrum | To which McCarthy ought to have responded: "Can you get me some more decent quality players signed in the January window, then? So I don't end up having to rely on Douglas as an option to beef up the midfield and Lawrence as the only goalscorer." | |
| |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:42 - Jan 22 with 712 views | Bluefish |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:41 - Jan 22 by Guthrum | To which McCarthy ought to have responded: "Can you get me some more decent quality players signed in the January window, then? So I don't end up having to rely on Douglas as an option to beef up the midfield and Lawrence as the only goalscorer." |
And we will get them | |
| |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:48 - Jan 22 with 683 views | blueblueburleymcgrew |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:41 - Jan 22 by Bluefish | So mick is told to play more youngsters and change the style but because we then lose he has to go immediately? That doesn't make sense |
Change in style has been evident since the start of the season but though it's clearly the right thing to do Mick hasn't delivered results. Other than Dozzell (who he took off at half time and replaced with the evergreen Douglas) which youngster fetarured in yesterday's game? | | | |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:49 - Jan 22 with 676 views | Guthrum |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:42 - Jan 22 by Bluefish | And we will get them |
Diagouraga could turn out to be the first of those. Maybe even Moore the other, who knows? But currently, we don't have enough strength in depth to be able to perform consistently. If, say, Lawrence has an off-day (and it sounded like he had a bit of a quiet one yesterday), we don't score. Berra's form is shaky, at best, weakens the whole back-line. | |
| |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 10:59 - Jan 22 with 646 views | ColchesterBlue1985 | Mick has said countless times he is left to manage the team with no interference. If ME suggested such a thing MM would walk I have no doubt. He would not settle for being told what to do by anybody. | | | |
All our club needs us a quick conversation on 11:02 - Jan 22 with 621 views | monytowbray | I don't feel it's ME's place to tell MM how to do his job, but it is his place to tell him he's not doing his job, if that makes sense? When the owner starts picking the team it's even deeper sh1t. | |
| |
| |