By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I had a thought this morning about this. I'm a big fan of freedom of speech, particularly applied to technology, BUT - is Twitter a worthwhile freedom to have if it provides the platform to cause a nuclear war (or even tensions of one)?
Struggling with that, as although it would clearly be the 'right' thing to do to prevent something in that event, ultimately it is a reaction to root cause, which is: 1) a petulant, narcissistic and deeply insecure chimp is in the White House and 2) the President of the USA having so much solitary power is absurd in the 20th century, let alone the 21st.
0
....aaaaand we still won't see the second round of the league cup... on 13:52 - Aug 9 with 3596 views
....aaaaand we still won't see the second round of the league cup... on 13:20 - Aug 9 by tcblue
I had a thought this morning about this. I'm a big fan of freedom of speech, particularly applied to technology, BUT - is Twitter a worthwhile freedom to have if it provides the platform to cause a nuclear war (or even tensions of one)?
Struggling with that, as although it would clearly be the 'right' thing to do to prevent something in that event, ultimately it is a reaction to root cause, which is: 1) a petulant, narcissistic and deeply insecure chimp is in the White House and 2) the President of the USA having so much solitary power is absurd in the 20th century, let alone the 21st.
Twitter would be fine if you had to pass an IQ test set at say 40 to use it, as Trump would fail.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
