| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) 16:37 - May 6 with 965 views | Smithy |
|  |
| |  |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:38 - May 6 with 961 views | Bent_double |
First one we've scored. Hull away, I believe, Didz missed/had it saved. |  |
| |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:39 - May 6 with 954 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Linked to attacking intent aren't they? |  |
| |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:42 - May 6 with 931 views | Mullet |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:39 - May 6 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Linked to attacking intent aren't they? |
And good refereeing. Had a stonewall at Forest not given despite it hitting an arm right in front of two officials.
Let alone Boro lucky not to give one away and lose 2/3 players in the reverse fixture. |  |
| |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:57 - May 6 with 877 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Was that our first penalty of the season? (n/t) on 16:42 - May 6 by Mullet |
And good refereeing. Had a stonewall at Forest not given despite it hitting an arm right in front of two officials.
Let alone Boro lucky not to give one away and lose 2/3 players in the reverse fixture. |
There will always be the odd one that should have been but wasn't given and the odd lucky one given. Overall, the more times players and the ball are in the opposition box, the more likely they are.
It is not a dig at MM (I thought he did an excellent job), but his style was never going to get many of them. It was the same argument when Man Utd used to get lots of them at Old Trafford. When they were dominating games and frequently in the opposition area it was inevitable. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
