Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Town Miss Out on Category One
Thursday, 24th Jul 2014 16:09

Town have failed in their application to upgrade their academy to category one status. The club was told earlier today that it had missed the required 75 per cent mark in April's audit by just 0.3 per cent.

“We’re obviously disappointed to miss out on category one this time,” academy director Bryan Klug told the club website.

“The staff, in particular Helen Broughton, worked tirelessly to prepare for the audit and we felt confident that our structure is good enough to be granted category one status.

“We’re all disappointed, frustrated but we go again. Getting to category one is our aim and everyone is fully committed to getting there.

“I have spoken to Marcus [Evans, club owner] and he’s as disappointed as the rest of us but he’s fully supportive of us moving forward and continuing to push for category one.

“We have made a lot of progress over the past year and we will continue to make progress.

“We will be audited again next season and we will be doing everything we can to achieve category one status because that puts us in the best position to produce young footballers for Ipswich Town.”

The academy will remain at category two which means, amongst other things, that they will face the likes of Colchester United and Brentford at U21 and U18 levels next season. They will also receive a Premier League grant of £480,000, compared with a category one grant of £775,000.


Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



Jaffe added 20:39 - Jul 24
it means our u21's play Brentford and millwall instead of arsenal and tottenham
0

blueboy1981 added 20:52 - Jul 24
..... Don't make excuses PLEASE - the Club had MORE than ample time to prepare and meet the criteria.

Like it, or not, the Club wasn't committed to it early enough - and it has always been a half hearted effort.

Hope our £10 per month towards the Academy will now be refunded - I await the offer of the refund !!!!!

Disgusted to be honest - and not by the people making the judgement.
-6

trncbluearmy added 20:59 - Jul 24
I Will continue to contribute, but blueboy1981 makes a decent point ,ITFC should have got this sorted, I sort of get the feeling we tried to do just enough and it has backfired badly

We will still stuf the budgie scum though

COYB
1

blueboy1981 added 21:01 - Jul 24
.......... nice to know our Club infrastructure is bracketed with Colchester and Brentford - should do wonders for all our confidences.
-2

blueboy1981 added 21:04 - Jul 24
....... only fools will shrug this off without being concerned - Cat 1 was absolutely essential for the Club, if indeed the Club is heading in the right direction.
-3

petermorris added 21:09 - Jul 24
People getting at Clegg over ‘painting of turnstiles' shouldn't forget the important Cobbold Stand pressure washing also completed during his tenure. Surely this could account for the missing 0.3%?
0

Dozzells_Bobblehat added 21:57 - Jul 24
I was waiting for it. Lots of sensible posts on here but I knew it would come and I knew it would come from one person. Blueboy you are a bore sir.
2

flashblue added 22:13 - Jul 24
Can't see why everyone is moaning. There has to be a line drawn somewhere and we failed. 75% is the absolute bare minimum standard and nothing to be proud of. Even had we scraped through 75% is pretty poor.
-4

cats_whiskers added 22:27 - Jul 24
We are a provincial club and just won't ever be able to compete with the likes of big city clubs ever again, like we were able to under Bobby Robson and The Cobbolds regime.
There will be a whole lot of wastage regarding young players in the near future as those major clubs won't give them the chance to progress.
Take Chelsea for example, all big money foreign signings this summer, who of their U21s is being given a chance? even talk of Drogba returning!!
Is he classed as the Future of the game!
The amount of money Sky and BT gives these premiership sides is actually killing English football.
6

budgieplucker added 22:36 - Jul 24
Taken from the Sunderland website....

"Sunderland boasts one of the best Academies in the world, having been granted the highest possible rating during the Premier League's EPPP (Elite Player Performance Plan) assessments."

We more than matched them in the FA youth cup last season at PR. So I am not convinced that this is down to inferior raw talent or coaching. Neither did I see any budding Messi's in a red and white shirt that night.

The academy system, overhyped, over expensive, devisive for the football league and too highly influenced by the premier league at the end of the day. So good for English football that we now need to entertain suggestions of B teams joining a collection of Skrill teams to form a league!!!

As MM says often "bonkers", the absence of a football combination league has created a setback where young players do not get the opportunity to ply their trade against seasoned pros on a regular basis.

As players graduate from the academy being offered a one year contract (which seems the norm) there is only a limited number of places in the squad so the churn on a normal annual basis is high, as long as youngsters aren't getting good competitive games then the liklihood of them breaking into the first team seems remote and then they probably need a loan session to a Skrill Team (aka Marriot - one of our better youngsters)

Perhaps we should shut down our academy, give our youngsters to a Skrill Team, a bit of creative accounting by the Marcus Evans Group to sponser the Skrill Team and ITFC to have a partnership agreement to acquire them back if they blossom.
2

hancockingoal added 22:49 - Jul 24
Why are people getting so worked up? This category status is total boll*cks! Robson produced the best team from developing youth despite being an an fashionable club by great scouts with an eye for talent. Invest in good scouts and snap up the best young rejects from the greedy premiership clubs who buy foreign mercenaries and don't have time to nurture home grown talent! Fact the best 14/15 year olds don't make the grade!
6

budgieplucker added 23:05 - Jul 24
i kinda agree with you @hancockingoal. The word academy is now so overused in education that it has a totally diluted meaning. Dario Gradi didn't do a bad job at Crewe either.

Something like "The Ipswich young professional programme" could be developed to show there are other ways than the failed blueprint of the academy system.
2

runningout added 23:54 - Jul 24
a few delicate minds on here.... doesn.t surprise me, and I'm just a mug of a fan. So not sure why the powers that be are saddened by the below 75% mark... Get real
-1

Marcus added 01:12 - Jul 25
We aimed at 75%. The question is what more would be required to aim for 80/85%. Live and learn - next year we'll be better prepared.
1

harlingblue added 01:21 - Jul 25
Have missed out because our Under 21 team was so poor last year?
2

muhrensleftfoot added 06:47 - Jul 25
The buck should stop at the top for this fiasco. The "academy director" must be held accountable. Maybe Roy Keane was actually right to let him go.
-4

bluelodgeblue added 07:52 - Jul 25
But surely the objective was to get as close to 100% as possible. to fall short of the pass mark sounds as if we were trying to do it on the cheap? sounds familiar does,nt it?
2

Jaffe added 08:35 - Jul 25
yet again Ipswich fans short changed. ok we can never pay a transfer fee ok we have to make do with frees and loans ok season ticket holders will contribute to the cost of academy

we are sold cat1 as compensation for being the most boring club in the league with the idea that we are looking to develop the club around youth and development

unfortunately the club could only make the effort to charge season ticket purchases for the costs is this how ME makes his money by scamming his clients?
2

blueboy1981 added 09:16 - Jul 25
Same old people condoning failure with the minus button yet again - Does that ring a bell Bobblehat ???

With Supporters like you lot - the Club doesn't need to succeed in anything ................ you'll all be 'satisfied' - as usual.

Boring, run of the mill, expect nowt - suits you fine.

That's why we will stay as we are - as a Club. No need for more.
-4

blueboy1981 added 09:17 - Jul 25
......... and TRUTH hurts - as you all well know.
-5

PunchNoHopers added 11:26 - Jul 25
How irritating such a small margin, we should appeal to an independent panel of judges and get the decision reversed!!! Probably set up so Championship clubs automtically score -25.3% anyway, so noone ever gets in!!
2

tractorboybig added 12:13 - Jul 25
The people involved knew the standards required at the onset,
Looks like a number of staff need sacking and get someone in who can achieve.
2

JWM added 12:44 - Jul 25
The truth is that EEEP was designed in such a way by Scudamore and his Cronies to only allow the 'big boys' to benefit by having access to talented young kids from other lower clubs on the cheap! Why the hell should we spend all our time and trouble in nurturing, developing and establishing kids when they are all free to leave for a pittance if they turn out to be any good? The whole thing is a complete an utter farce and a con trick. Yet another kick in the teeth for football clubs like us who play by the rules and try do to do the right things. No wonder the English game is in such a bloody dire mess! The Premier League gets everything and the rest can go hang!
2

TrabzonBlue added 13:19 - Jul 25
Taxi for Helen Broughton
-1

blueboy1981 added 13:28 - Jul 25
JWM ......... cannot disagree with you, BUT all current scenarios considered we just had to have Cat 1 - otherwise we fall into the category of the lesser lights who have no hope of being anything other, for obvious reasons.
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 295 bloggers

Ipswich Town Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024