Forum | We didn't really need to do much in these three games. by TheBoyBlue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

We didn't really need to do much in these three games. 19:32 - Feb 1 with 734 views

Don't lose against Rotherham, Peterborough or Sunderland. Mick Mills was right. Three draws would've been fine. If we'd drawn these last two we'd still be 2nd. We can't even manage that.

Blog:

[Blog] The Homer Simpson of the Championship

We didn't really need to do much in these three games. on 19:39 - Feb 1 with 686 views

Illinoisblue

In 180 mins v Rotherham and Posh we were just brushed aside. We’re supposed to go toe to toe with our rivals yet instead we looked like a struggling League 2 side. Evans is awful, Lambert’s failing again, the players show no fight or heart. What a time to be an Ipswich fan

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

We didn't really need to do much in these three games. on 19:41 - Feb 1 with 663 views

BLUEBEAT

So a win against Sunderland and everyone is happy again?

Hooray for #wsc!

Poll:

W or W

We didn't really need to do much in these three games. on 19:45 - Feb 1 with 647 views

TheBoyBlue

We didn't really need to do much in these three games. on 19:41 - Feb 1 by BLUEBEAT
So a win against Sunderland and everyone is happy again? Hooray for #wsc!

In the scheme of things that would be an incredible result! The point Mick Mills was making was that a draw against these three would see our promotion rivals dropping two points at the same time. Wins would of course have been better, but three draws ought to have been attainable and we've got nowhere near.

Frankly we don't stand a chance of getting anything in Sunderland, let alone a win.

Blog:

[Blog] The Homer Simpson of the Championship

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread