| Cook's system 08:01 - Nov 24 with 398 views | IPSWICHFANITFC |
4231, attacking full backs high and wide, 2 holding to protect and start attacks, 3 number 10's interchanging roles behind a striker. That's my take on Cook's system.
We have a BIG problem at full back until January. The only full back effective at adding something to the attack is KVY. Nothing down the left hand side. Clements has done ok, but he's not adding quality into the attacks. Have we recruited poorly here..?
Big area to improve in January. We need two full backs who get up and down the left and right otherwise the 3 number 10's are ineffective due to having to hold wider roles which doesn't suit them as shown last night.
It's more of an issue against these better teams like Rotherham and Oxford who can pack the central midfield with bodies and get into shape with no threat out wide (especially if Burns and Edwards aren't starting too!) |  |
| |  |
| Cook's system on 08:05 - Nov 24 with 367 views | Oldboy |
Not the fullbacks that are the main problem. Penney is a seasoned professional who should know what is expected from him. Clement should have been left out of that one and Penney/Burgess should have started. The manager is at fault for that. |  | | |
| Cook's system on 08:15 - Nov 24 with 326 views | IPSWICHFANITFC |
| Cook's system on 08:05 - Nov 24 by Oldboy |
Not the fullbacks that are the main problem. Penney is a seasoned professional who should know what is expected from him. Clement should have been left out of that one and Penney/Burgess should have started. The manager is at fault for that. |
They are a big problem if they don't contribute to attacks because they don't have the quality or threat. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
