Manchester City 4-1 Ipswich Town - Highlights Sunday, 25th Aug 2024 10:15 Highlights of yesterday’s 4-1 defeat at Manchester City.
Photo: Reuters
Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.
Radlett_blue added 10:36 - Aug 25
First 2 City goals were very avoidable. Soft penalty given by VAR against Davis (if that was a penalty, why didn't VAR give us one when Davis was brought down in the City box?) & dithering when playing out from the back (we will have to get sharper at this). |  | |
ThaiBlue added 11:05 - Aug 25
Sorry but that was a penalty all day for us with that challenge on Davis. |  | |
TimmyH added 11:06 - Aug 25
Watched the 2 penalty decisions over a number of times and you can't see any real contact on Savinho...he goes flying as if his foot was caught in a bear trap, our call was as good as theirs. We still probably would have lost but not the point. |  | |
bobble added 11:17 - Aug 25
Not playing for us overseas fans again,,,very disappointing how we are treated... |  | |
terryf added 11:21 - Aug 25
We should have had a penalty for sure! Although he made one very good save the Keeper needs to get his act together big time! We cannot afford to carry any duds in this Division! |  | |
tractor_lady added 11:32 - Aug 25
Terrible decision re penalty, if it had been City not doubt would be given… also wasnt theirs on edge of box?? |  | |
Steve_ITFC_Sweden added 11:36 - Aug 25
I thought BBC MOTD was pretty biased towards City. Very little said about a new team to the PL - surely that would be of interest to the general football public who have no doubt heard about Haarland, City and Guardiola plently of times already. Their penalty looked very soft indeed on tv, but it wasn't even discussed. And our own penalty shout wasn't even shown to the best of my knowledge. But there you go - it's all about the Big Boys now. |  | |
Steve_ITFC_Sweden added 11:48 - Aug 25
Oh, and for those knocking Muric, Pickford made a very similar error vs Spurs - and he's the England goalie. I.e. it can happen to anyone. Give the guy a break! |  | |
bluesman added 12:12 - Aug 25
How could City have got a penalty and not us??? And ours a stone waller |  | |
bluesman added 12:15 - Aug 25
City should be below us on -44 points but thats in fairyland |  | |
algarvefan added 13:11 - Aug 25
to those of you complaining about penalties, just before the end man City were denied a stonewall penalty decision with no VAR, so kind of evens that out, as for the one given it was borderline and the ref watched it so many times for me that says he wasn't sure, but then gave it. Welcome to the Premier League. |  | |
Broadbent23 added 13:49 - Aug 25
Walton had a shocker against Bolton in L 1 1-5 I think, and did well for the rest of the season. Therefore Muric with extra coaching will improve. We are building a better team. Trust in the project. |  | |
MickMillsTash added 14:43 - Aug 25
Theirs was a pen - correct use of VAR Ours was a pen - was VAR used ? whether Davis had the ball under control or not he was clattered. Does anyone know how to check the VAR dialogue over that incident ? I thought Ipswich being in the Premier league might stop me falling asleep during MOTD but I guess just one bell-end smile from Micah Richards is enough for the brain to tell me an hours sleep is the better option |  | |
Global_Blue added 16:20 - Aug 25
It would be good to get an explanation from the officials on how that challenge on Davis was not a penalty. Baffles me. He was sandwiched between two players, one coming in from the side didn't even get close to going for the ball. Shockingly bad decision that someone needs to explain, especially when the prizes and the costs are so high. Music, I'm sure, will prove to be an excellent signing, but I can't help thinking he wasn't ready for this match and that Walton deserved his place yesterday. |  | |
SpiritOfJohn added 16:35 - Aug 25
Two very similar penalty shouts, neither given by the ref; one gets VAR intervention and one doesn't. Two plausible explanations: the first is that the one given was for Man City and the one not given was for Ipswich i.e. VAR bias; the only other possible explanation is that for our appeal play continued for ages and it was 'forgotten' by the time play stopped.. Next time we have a penalty appeal we need to commit a cheap foul or kick the ball out and make a fuss so that a VAR check happens. |  | |
IpswichToon added 16:52 - Aug 25
A few asking above about VAR, and from what the in-game commentators said on Opus, VAR did have a look at the Davis pen shout, but they decided on no-intervention. That happened while the ball was still in play. As others have said, it did seem ridiculous that we didn’t get that. I agree theirs was a penalty, but ours seemed a more clear penalty decision. |  | |
Broadbent23 added 17:31 - Aug 25
The issue with the non VAR event with LD is that Man City have cheated. Hopefully they will be found guilty over the 115 charges and maybe relegated following a huge points deduction. Otherwise the PL is crooked and favours the top six sides. |  | |
fifeblue added 20:45 - Aug 25
If that wasn't a clear penalty (the foul on Davis) then my cock's a kipper. One rule for one ... |  | |
Facefacts added 21:42 - Aug 25
Already sick of VAR ref cheats, and only 2 games in. Clear and obvious error should have been given.. 3 - 2 at HT game on. |  | |
KiwiBlue2 added 00:58 - Aug 26
Very disappointed that we in New Zealand cannot access the video. After 50 years of supporting Ipswich, including several visits, I had hoped for better. |  | |
senduntd added 13:57 - Aug 26
HIGHLIGHTS ARE AVAILABLE ON U TUBE. If you didn't get my first message. |  | |
TimmyH added 17:40 - Aug 26
Bournemouth robbed of a win over Newcastle yesterday...not 1 Newcastle player put their hand up thinking it was handball (clearly off the shoulder) and the ref thought it was okay then VAR came in and overturned that decision which was NOT a clear and obvious mistake! Makes you think! |  | |
You need to login in order to post your comments
|
Blogs 298 bloggersIpswich Town Polls |