| This offside rule is stupid. 00:39 - Mar 5 with 1050 views | Melford |
So you can stand in front of the goalkeeper and interfere with his line of vision in an offside position but not touch the ball and not be given offside? If you are offside that should be it, no interfering with play BS. |  |
| |  |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 00:58 - Mar 5 with 1022 views | The_Last_Baron |
Which incident are you referring to? Which game? |  |
| |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 10:32 - Mar 5 with 888 views | GeoffSentence |
no you can't. that was why we had a goal disallowed against wolves earlier in the season, sears was doing just that. |  |
| |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 10:40 - Mar 5 with 868 views | Radlett_blue |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 10:32 - Mar 5 by GeoffSentence |
no you can't. that was why we had a goal disallowed against wolves earlier in the season, sears was doing just that. |
Exactly. It's all down to interpretation & hence the controversy. But the need to be "interfering with play" has always been part of the law. |  |
| |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 11:01 - Mar 5 with 833 views | strikalite |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 10:40 - Mar 5 by Radlett_blue |
Exactly. It's all down to interpretation & hence the controversy. But the need to be "interfering with play" has always been part of the law. |
Yep, offside should be plain and simple like it used to be, all this phase one and now it's phase two is impossible to properly defend against imo.. |  | | |
| This offside rule is stupid. on 14:16 - Mar 5 with 754 views | Exiled_Blue |
Referring to Forest's first goal yesterday? Definitely should have been disallowed, Assombalonga tried to head the ball so he must be interfering with play. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
