By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I don't think he even read the articles he posted.
You would like to think that wouldn't you. I have read them, and the 2017 BJM paper that has prompted this "Tories have killed thousands" . It's not proven. I have posted a couple of links that conclude this, there are more of course, as there are many articles suggesting austerity has been a direct cause of death. That's my opinion from what I have read - cannot be proven and it's a little misleading to throw these unproven figures around.
Indicators are best when off unless you are turning right or left of course- mine are centre most of the time and certainly would never stay on left as much as yours; you must be constantly hitting the kerb.
Another one for you to take those blinkers off for, Timefliesbyintheblue -
Billionaire tory donor John Bloor had his application to build a 1000 home development in Berks repeatedly rejected. Robert Jenrick then waved it through. 48 hrs later Bloor gave £150k to the tory party. There's probably not a person in Britain who wouldn't call this corruption
Another one for you to take those blinkers off for, Timefliesbyintheblue -
Billionaire tory donor John Bloor had his application to build a 1000 home development in Berks repeatedly rejected. Robert Jenrick then waved it through. 48 hrs later Bloor gave £150k to the tory party. There's probably not a person in Britain who wouldn't call this corruption
"There's probably not a person in Britain who wouldn't call this corruption"
There's a few right here on TWTD.
They don't care. This place has been overrun by cretins, racists, liars and trolls.
Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
There are many reasons if I’m honest mate. I’ll put a few below but the reason I’m more vocal about it on here than in ‘real’ life’ is due to the sanctimonious attitude of a number of people on here. For example, nobody is asked for a detailed break down of why they vote Labour. It’s as if some of you can’t believe that Tories exist. If you don’t loudly tell everyone how much you hate the Tories this approach is considered so weird you automatically must be on a wind up. Anyway, that’s why I’m pretty vocal about it on here, it frustrates me how it’s considered strange or unusual to support the Conservatives, there were something like 14 million of us at the last election, we do exist! Personal reasons: I’m naturally economically liberal, I believe in free markets. I believe excessive state intervention stifles enterprise and innnovation. Call me old fashioned but I’m socially conservative. I believe strongly in the rule of law and have strong respect for great British institutions (e.g the monarchy). I have a firm belief in personal responsibility. Teach a man to fish etc. Related to an above point but I believe a lower base rate of tax equals a higher total tax take. A small percentage of a lot is greater than a big percentage of not much. There’s a few to be getting started with. Hope that helps you understand why some people vote Tory.
"Call me old fashioned but I’m socially conservative. I believe strongly in the rule of law and have strong respect for great British institutions (e.g the monarchy). I have a firm belief in personal responsibility. Teach a man to fish etc. "
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that Paz, but what beats me is why you would then vote for a party that *in its current version* proves every day that it couldn't give a crap about either. Hancock broke the law, Williamson broke the law, Gove broke the law, Johnson lied to the Queen, broke the law and has been a stranger to personal responsibility his entire life.... as such a strong believer in the rule of law, what do you think should happen when government ministers break it?
"Call me old fashioned but I’m socially conservative. I believe strongly in the rule of law and have strong respect for great British institutions (e.g the monarchy). I have a firm belief in personal responsibility. Teach a man to fish etc. "
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that Paz, but what beats me is why you would then vote for a party that *in its current version* proves every day that it couldn't give a crap about either. Hancock broke the law, Williamson broke the law, Gove broke the law, Johnson lied to the Queen, broke the law and has been a stranger to personal responsibility his entire life.... as such a strong believer in the rule of law, what do you think should happen when government ministers break it?
[Post edited 16 Jun 2021 9:31]
Which laws did each of them break? If they have genuinely broken the law then they should face criminal prosecution.
Which laws did each of them break? If they have genuinely broken the law then they should face criminal prosecution.
It takes a second to search, Paz - the fact that you don't bother doing even a small bit of research instead of posting says a lot about your motivation to find the truth.
It takes a second to search, Paz - the fact that you don't bother doing even a small bit of research instead of posting says a lot about your motivation to find the truth.
It takes a second to search, Paz - the fact that you don't bother doing even a small bit of research instead of posting says a lot about your motivation to find the truth.
Illegal means breaking a law, doing something that there is an explicit law saying you cannot do. Unlawful means doing something that you do not have the right to do. This article states they acted unlawfully - so technically they did not break a law - just saying
Illegal means breaking a law, doing something that there is an explicit law saying you cannot do. Unlawful means doing something that you do not have the right to do. This article states they acted unlawfully - so technically they did not break a law - just saying
So by your own admission, you don't recognise corruption when it's right there in front of your eyes, simply because the people engaging in it suit your own interests and purposes. That makes you morally corrupt too.
Illegal means breaking a law, doing something that there is an explicit law saying you cannot do. Unlawful means doing something that you do not have the right to do. This article states they acted unlawfully - so technically they did not break a law - just saying
Yes that's right - some posters would be outraged of the use of the semantics.
So by your own admission, you don't recognise corruption when it's right there in front of your eyes, simply because the people engaging in it suit your own interests and purposes. That makes you morally corrupt too.
Whoa - the name calling we have on here! Mr Ryorry, I will pit my morals against yours at anytime. I was trying to explain why there has been no court case and no criminal prosecution. Where did I say that I do not recognise corruption. Like many politicians you make it up as you go along.
Whoa - the name calling we have on here! Mr Ryorry, I will pit my morals against yours at anytime. I was trying to explain why there has been no court case and no criminal prosecution. Where did I say that I do not recognise corruption. Like many politicians you make it up as you go along.
Nice to see gender assumptions still alive and kicking....
Just one small problem; sell their houses to who, Ben? Fcking Aquaman?
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
