By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Son of a friend is at Uni and keeps himself going by working part-time in a restaurant. He's been laid-off and asked landlord if he can pay 50% rent until he gets sorted and can back-pay.
Answer - "no you signed a contact and need to pay in full."
That is good to know but my general point about a contract signed under duress (whether for a rental property or anything else) not being binding still stands as a general principle of English Law, does it not?
Broadly speaking- yes. You are right that duress can be difficult to prove.
But there is really no relevance on a landlord and tenant situation- as such an agreement would not get around the need to seek a proper order and warrant anyway.
The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett)