Forum | New START by Guthrum

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

New START 23:48 - Jan 29 with 546 views

The Russians have agreed to extend it, which is a good thing.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/29/putin-signs-last-minute-extension-

	Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll:	McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog:	[Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

New START on 00:09 - Jan 30 with 504 views

StokieBlue

Isn't it almost irrelevant? The warheads it allows are more than enough to do multi-generational damage and Russia have progressed to moving nuclear cruise missiles it's less relevant.

So, it's great news but there is a bigger picture.

SB

SB - (not Simon Batford)

New START on 00:27 - Jan 30 with 475 views

Guthrum

New START on 00:09 - Jan 30 by StokieBlue
Isn't it almost irrelevant? The warheads it allows are more than enough to do multi-generational damage and Russia have progressed to moving nuclear cruise missiles it's less relevant. So, it's great news but there is a bigger picture. SB

The significance being that it's the last remaining US-Russian nuclear arms control treaty. But it's not been allowed to slip away. The toehold is still there.

	Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll:	McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog:	[Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

New START on 00:31 - Jan 30 with 474 views

StokieBlue

New START on 00:27 - Jan 30 by Guthrum
The significance being that it's the last remaining US-Russian nuclear arms control treaty. But it's not been allowed to slip away. The toehold is still there.

Nice but is it really significant?

A toehold is great but the momentum is still clear.

SB

SB - (not Simon Batford)

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread