Forum | This might be an interesting discussion by StokieBlue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

This might be an interesting discussion 10:37 - Mar 19 with 314 views

So there are many people who favour less centralised government and some who would go further and prefer to have totally self-governed local areas without any centralisation at all.

The second thing is essentially what this proposal is:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56409924

However, as always there is a caveat. It would be on land owned by a tech firm with all transactions and interactions done on the blockchain and partially funded with a tax on transactions. So in one way you'd get the freedom of small local government but with the downside of a totally digital existence without likes like cash.

I think the first question would need to be: How divergent from the laws of the land could the autonomous local government be? If it was too far (ie. no correlation to other laws) then that would be a big concern.

SB

This might be an interesting discussion on 12:06 - Mar 19 with 266 views

You_Bloo_Right

One does question the motivation and I wonder what "cool things" Berns has in mind. Without details wouldn't residents simply be asked to swap one unaccountable tech firm for another?

Paid in a crypto currency does also sound echoes of company scrip to me.

Poll:

Are this group of ITFC players the best squad in the division?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread