Forum | 1st 9 and then the next 9 by powinswitch

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

1st 9 and then the next 9 09:49 - Dec 5 with 503 views

Our first 9 managers were in post from 1937 to 2002, a smidgen short of 65 years. Our next appointment will be the 9th of the next batch, and he will start some 19 years after the first.

I think the decision to replace Cook is the right one. I just hope the next appointment is in position for a number of years, providing the consistent leadership we surely need.

1st 9 and then the next 9 on 09:53 - Dec 5 with 461 views

Guthrum

That is more a reflection of the changing nature of football.

Plus there's six years of wartime in that first section. Even then, some of the managers didn't last long (e.g. Milburn)

	Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll:	McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog:	[Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1st 9 and then the next 9 on 09:53 - Dec 5 with 462 views

Pendejo

It's worth pointing out 4 of them were in the 60s, when the club took action to improve things. 3 of those managers left under their own terms admittedly... Albeit one 14 years later.

	uberima fides
Poll:	Who will Charlie Austin play for next season?

1st 9 and then the next 9 on 10:19 - Dec 5 with 375 views

BloomBlue

And our most successful period as a club was?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread