Forum | PL Referee KMI Decisions by EastTownBlue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

PL Referee KMI Decisions 10:49 - Jan 13 with 1013 views

An article from Dale Johnson detailing the PL Key Match Incidents Panel review of refereeing decisions for the first half of the season.

Unsurprisingly they thought we should have had penalties against Man City and Leicester but they also thought it was correct that VAR did not intervene. In relation to second yellow cards they thought that the Kalvin Phillips one was incorrect and Sam Morsy should have been dismissed against Villa.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/43320888/revealed-every-var-referee-error

PL Referee KMI Decisions on 10:57 - Jan 13 with 912 views

DanTheMan

The Chaplin one still blows my mind, he was very clearly fouled. Anywhere else on the pitch, it would be given without a second thought.

Poll:

FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

PL Referee KMI Decisions on 11:14 - Jan 13 with 783 views

belgablue

PL Referee KMI Decisions on 10:57 - Jan 13 by DanTheMan
The Chaplin one still blows my mind, he was very clearly fouled. Anywhere else on the pitch, it would be given without a second thought.

Bonkers how it was correct not to intervene.

Poll:

Which nickname for ITFC do you prefer?

PL Referee KMI Decisions on 11:52 - Jan 13 with 666 views

norfsufblue

PL Referee KMI Decisions on 11:14 - Jan 13 by belgablue
Bonkers how it was correct not to intervene.

This is why VAR for subjective decisions should be appeal to the standing ref to review by captain/manager…. I really can’t see how the standing ref to ref would look at that from different angles and not award a penalty….. what it removes is a third party interference with his mindset.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread