| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X 17:09 - Apr 20 with 1194 views | le2blue |
Piers Morgan is rather litigious, they should take down their post
|  | | |  |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:12 - Apr 20 with 1127 views | textbackup |
He’s already commented saying expect a lawsuit or something |  |
| |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:13 - Apr 20 with 1090 views | le2blue |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:12 - Apr 20 by textbackup |
He’s already commented saying expect a lawsuit or something |
Wasn’t it started by Sitters? Might be an expensive Sunday… | | | |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:15 - Apr 20 with 1027 views | textbackup |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:13 - Apr 20 by le2blue |
Wasn’t it started by Sitters? Might be an expensive Sunday… |
I always thought it was, but think he’s said it’s not him before. | |
| |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:17 - Apr 20 with 995 views | Illinoisblue |
lol. Morgan’s a fool but even he’s not going to bring this to court.
From the Guardian a year ago:
Now, you might not trust Scobie or Campbell. But what Morgan left out is that Scobie’s story fits precisely with invoices, numbers on a Mirror reporter’s phone, and a matching article about Minogue bylined to someone the judge described as “a known phone hacker”. Campbell’s claims, meanwhile, are lent considerable weight by the fact that the Mirror had just used the same private investigators to do exactly the same thing to Peter Mandelson. The corroboration for Morgan’s claim of innocence, on the other hand, is simply that he keeps making it.
Set Scobie and Campbell aside, if you think they have sold the judge a pup. Perhaps because it was cold outside, Morgan didn’t find time in his doorstep speech to critique the rest of the evidence cited in the judgment.
Melanie Cantor, an agent and publicist, said that Morgan “always seemed to be the first person to know about events that had recently happened” involving her clients, and that invoices and phone records demonstrated that she had been repeatedly hacked by the Mirror’s reporters. The judge concluded that “sensitive information … was passed to Mr Morgan, who must have known how it had been obtained”. |  |
| |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:21 - Apr 20 with 862 views | le2blue |
| Anyone know who’s behind Ipswich Town Fans on X on 17:17 - Apr 20 by Illinoisblue |
lol. Morgan’s a fool but even he’s not going to bring this to court.
From the Guardian a year ago:
Now, you might not trust Scobie or Campbell. But what Morgan left out is that Scobie’s story fits precisely with invoices, numbers on a Mirror reporter’s phone, and a matching article about Minogue bylined to someone the judge described as “a known phone hacker”. Campbell’s claims, meanwhile, are lent considerable weight by the fact that the Mirror had just used the same private investigators to do exactly the same thing to Peter Mandelson. The corroboration for Morgan’s claim of innocence, on the other hand, is simply that he keeps making it.
Set Scobie and Campbell aside, if you think they have sold the judge a pup. Perhaps because it was cold outside, Morgan didn’t find time in his doorstep speech to critique the rest of the evidence cited in the judgment.
Melanie Cantor, an agent and publicist, said that Morgan “always seemed to be the first person to know about events that had recently happened” involving her clients, and that invoices and phone records demonstrated that she had been repeatedly hacked by the Mirror’s reporters. The judge concluded that “sensitive information … was passed to Mr Morgan, who must have known how it had been obtained”. |
Oh I don’t doubt what was in the guardian, just not worth risking it over Morgan. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
