Forum | We're not signing a striker are we. by BlueandTruesince82

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

We're not signing a striker are we. 10:32 - Feb 2 with 3381 views

Have to say that I feel if we really wanted Surridge we could get him. We might have to pay over the odds but we'd get him.

Bamford, hindsight isnt it. Most of said absolutely not when someone suggested him in the summer.

Hirst, form has dropped but we know he can deliver based on the promotion campaign, lets not be too harsh on the lad.

Having said all that, there must be someone out there who can have an impact

Poll:

Will Phil ever confirm we are actually close on a signing ever again

We're not signing a striker are we. on 19:26 - Feb 2 with 219 views

BouncebackIpswich

Well, looks like we've opted to stick with what we have. Unconvincing again from the recruitment side of things.

I hope that one of Hirst or Akpom are able to re find the form we know they're capable of and soon.

Failing that lets just stick Egeli or Nunez up top as a false 9 😂

Poll:

What rating out of 10 do you give to Ipswichs season up to this point?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread