Is it just me that thinks that the continued appearance of Three's logo on Chelsea's shirts, despite their public announcement that they were terminating their commercial arrangements with the club, smacks a little bit of saying the right things for the sake of good PR, yet doing something else entirely? I understand the argument that the sanctions on Chelsea/Abramovic would prohibit Chelsea from purchasing new shirts, but surely all that is needed is some strategically-positioned gaffer tape, similar to when West Ham's sponsor went bust once? Or, if Three really don't want to be associated with the Russian state, couldn't they just donate some new unbranded kits to the club? | |