 | Forum
Reply | This article is less than 5 years old
at 06:53 5 Sep 2025
Interesting that the academy was described as genuinely excellent 5 years ago but really hasn’t succeeded in bringing players through to the first team. That’s concerning |
| Forum
Reply | Chelsea v Fulham disallowed goal…
at 22:29 3 Sep 2025
Howard Webb is entirely deluded with his words. ‘We’ve established’ no sorry, nothing has been established as different decisions are reached for very similar scenarios, week in, week out. It’s all subjective and the only way forward to to have only the ref having an input to the decision with help of their linesmen . An utter mess |
| Forum
Thread | Do we think that’s it now?
at 10:19 29 Aug 2025
Assuming Egeli signs, are we expecting any further incomings or just outgoings? |
| Forum
Thread | Broadhead
at 21:12 25 Aug 2025
Injured already.
Calf injury ahead of Wrexham game tomorrow against PNE. And that’s why we didn’t keep him. As much as he had some quality, he’s made of glass. |
| Forum
Reply | Chaplin
at 16:02 23 Aug 2025
The constant hair fiddling wound me up at the Southampton game. It’s incessant and really annoying |
| Forum
Reply | Binnerwatch
at 09:58 19 Aug 2025
They’re almost as obsessed with us as you are with them. How sweet |
| Forum
Reply | It’s a shame that a great game of football…
at 13:10 16 Aug 2025
Erm, no.
I clearly stated the best player on the pitch deserves the MOTM performance. It’s a matter of opinion whether that was Ekitike, Seymento or someone else but the abuse element does not come into that debate in my opinion.
(If he was concussed I’d be more concerned he was allowed to play on.)
Liverpool bias was the most likely reason in any case. |
| Forum
Reply | It’s a shame that a great game of football…
at 09:43 16 Aug 2025
Why mention the abuse though? Nothing to do with the quality on the pitch regarding the MOTM decision. If he deserves the gong because of his performance then fair enough but don’t try and weight the decision with unnecessary reasoning. Let the football do the talking. |
| Forum
Reply | Is Omari
at 07:07 16 Aug 2025
There are other clauses, a buy back clause for example, that change the value of that deal to more than the initial fee. So the deal for McAtee is not directly comparable to that of Omari |
| Forum
Reply | Wonder how Brentford feel?
at 11:33 15 Aug 2025
But they could’ve had him for £35m couldn’t they! That was the clause they just didn’t meet them terms |
| Forum
Thread | Wonder how Brentford feel?
at 11:03 15 Aug 2025
Clearly wanted Omari. Thought they’d play silly b*ggers by offering the £35m in the clause but (assume deliberately) not meeting the terms and then hope to get him cheaper at a later date but ultimately missing out altogether. (Reported they thought they would be able to do so at the time).
Just get the deal done especially knowing the were about to get circa £67m for Mbeumo.
I think Forest are the better option for Omari anyway but assume he’s not particularly precious who is paying him. |
| Forum
Reply | Good news is. 180 minutes and we're unbeaten.
at 22:31 12 Aug 2025
You don’t need to post / start a thread with every single thought that pops into your head. Sometimes less is more. Quality not quantity etc etc.
Just friendly advice |
| | USA
|
Site Scores| Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 0 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.