By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:21 - Dec 22 by uefacup81
I dare say any assets they have will be fair game once the airlines and Gatwick pop their compensation claims in.
After the unlimited fine there'll be nothing left. Not worth suing an ordinary person for millions. You'll spend more than you'll get. I doubt you'd even get to enjoy the pleasure of seeing them bankrupted.
As another poster says they'll not have any assets after sentence as the damages awarded against them will be tremendous and multiples of anything they actually have.
As for sentence of imprisonment I think they'll get a total of 7 years or three and a half each.
0
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:45 - Dec 22 with 4956 views
On the sliding scale that commands an attempted murderer, with a knife, during an age of increased blade carrying received 21 months, the Gatwick woolybacks will get about a year.
0
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:52 - Dec 22 with 4920 views
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:45 - Dec 22 by ballycastle
On the sliding scale that commands an attempted murderer, with a knife, during an age of increased blade carrying received 21 months, the Gatwick woolybacks will get about a year.
Do you live in Ballycastle?
“Hello, I'm your MP. Actually I'm not. I'm your candidate. Gosh.”
Boris Johnson canvassing in Henley, 2005.
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:45 - Dec 22 by ballycastle
On the sliding scale that commands an attempted murderer, with a knife, during an age of increased blade carrying received 21 months, the Gatwick woolybacks will get about a year.
I agree with your idea. They haven't committed an offence that really endangers; so should get a lighter sentence than someone with violent intent. However, due to the cost and 'public' disruption, (that was intended) they'll get longer than some violent offenders do.
0
Drone arrests sweepstake on 15:10 - Dec 22 with 4861 views
Drone arrests sweepstake on 14:59 - Dec 22 by Wewillwin
I agree with your idea. They haven't committed an offence that really endangers; so should get a lighter sentence than someone with violent intent. However, due to the cost and 'public' disruption, (that was intended) they'll get longer than some violent offenders do.
'They haven't committed an offence that really endangers' - until you consider the potential effects of a drone-strike on an airliner in the most vulnerable phases of a flight (take-off and landing).
Drone arrests sweepstake on 15:10 - Dec 22 by Guthrum
'They haven't committed an offence that really endangers' - until you consider the potential effects of a drone-strike on an airliner in the most vulnerable phases of a flight (take-off and landing).
They'd only really endanger if they were getting close to a plain, the airport has to close if there's a drone nearby; as a potential threat is present
0
Drone arrests sweepstake on 15:38 - Dec 22 with 4770 views
Drone arrests sweepstake on 15:27 - Dec 22 by Wewillwin
They'd only really endanger if they were getting close to a plain, the airport has to close if there's a drone nearby; as a potential threat is present
If you fly a drone anywhere close to an airport, you're endangering passenger aircraft. These were seen going right over the terminals and runways.
Drone strike:
Drone strike:
This was the damage an Aeromexico 737 suffered this week due to a drone strike. Could you imagine if it hit the engine?? It would be catastrophic. pic.twitter.com/LvrZ2Xo8Cf
Drone arrests sweepstake on 15:38 - Dec 22 by Guthrum
If you fly a drone anywhere close to an airport, you're endangering passenger aircraft. These were seen going right over the terminals and runways.
Drone strike:
Drone strike:
This was the damage an Aeromexico 737 suffered this week due to a drone strike. Could you imagine if it hit the engine?? It would be catastrophic. pic.twitter.com/LvrZ2Xo8Cf
As I said above: you'd need to fly the drone near a flying plain! It would be easy to avoid the flight path and fly lower than a plain even approaching or departing a runway. Still shutting the airport without endangering. The airport has to close if there's a potential danger; not actual Your post has nothing to do with people causing disruption at an airports, for its own purpose. To be fair this is a first of this nature
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
