This sums up the FA for me 13:20 - Nov 15 with 2830 views | sparks | https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46202509 Ref makes a human mistake. Improvises in a pragmatic and entirely fair way. Causes no harm at all- save a little embarrassment for himself. Gets the book thrown at him for it. Havent they got better things to do? Like offering a modicum of support to grass roots clubs and managers rather than treating them like minions? | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| | |
This sums up the FA for me on 17:53 - Nov 15 with 453 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
You’re way off on this I’m afraid There’s a rule as there has to be something to denote who kicks off, but to replace it on the spot with a suitable alternative in the event of an error is common sense. That the FA would enforce this rule so literally is exactly the OP’s point - it’s pointless and way OTT I think at worst you can make an argument that the ref wasn’t taking the women’s game seriously enough (ie. would he have done that in a men’s league match), but that’s projecting and a slap on the wrist would seem appropriate, not a 21 day ban | |
| |
This sums up the FA for me on 17:58 - Nov 15 with 449 views | ronnyd |
Yes, it,s in Law 8. The start and restart of play. | | | |
on 18:08 - Nov 15 with 432 views | _ |
This sums up the FA for me on 17:58 - Nov 15 by ronnyd | Yes, it,s in Law 8. The start and restart of play. |
| | | |
| |