Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Why 12? Why not 48? 21:59 - Feb 4 with 483 viewsBLUEBEAT

These are 4-sided pillars, right?

Do they intend to ‘wrap’ 1 player around 1 pillar?

Could have a different player for every flat side...

Poll: Most pointless?

0

Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 with 467 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular?

Poll: Should there be a second referendum?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:08 - Feb 4 with 382 viewsBLUEBEAT

Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 by Nthsuffolkblue

Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular?


The 99/00 playoff winners were probably our last ‘great’ team...

Poll: Most pointless?

0

Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 with 370 viewsOldsmoker

Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize?
If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great.
If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats.

Poll: Do you think Posters should be allowed to the same poll twice?

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:37 - Feb 4 with 350 viewsBLUEBEAT

Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 by Oldsmoker

Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize?
If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great.
If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats.


“future greats”

That’s the spirit!

Poll: Most pointless?

2

Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2020