By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Sadly this just shows what we've all know for some time that the EFL governance procedures and regulations are not worth anything and never actually acted on. They make the auditors of Wirecard look positively competant ( and they missed $2bn hole in the books of cash that never existed! )
3
A bit more background on Wigan from 200% on 12:40 - Jul 2 with 803 views
This was posted off the back of a Price of Football tweet earlier. If true, it shows how badly EFL have f*cked up
To summarise, new owner also had a stake in old ownership, old ownership have lent new £28m to buy the club, decided not to fund it and put us into admin to recoup £28m, which is £13m more than what they bought the club for. SCAM and the EFL are also accountable!
A bit more background on Wigan from 200% on 12:44 - Jul 2 by ElderGrizzly
This was posted off the back of a Price of Football tweet earlier. If true, it shows how badly EFL have f*cked up
To summarise, new owner also had a stake in old ownership, old ownership have lent new £28m to buy the club, decided not to fund it and put us into admin to recoup £28m, which is £13m more than what they bought the club for. SCAM and the EFL are also accountable!
I see from The Price of Football twotter account that the House of Lords Select Committee has just advised that betting sponsorship shouldn't be allowed on shirts. PL only, but it's a start.