| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly 15:03 - Jul 31 with 4170 views | BlacknGoldnBlue |
Even before the game has kicked off there has been criticism of team selection! I'm sure that whatever the result there will be criticism of formation, players, substitutes etc!
Just remember this is a friendly! There is no qualification or points on offer! This is about fitness, avoiding injuries and building relationships with team mates in a very new team!
So before you post - remember it is just a friendly! |  |
| |  |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 02:32 - Aug 1 with 388 views | Bluearmy71 |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 21:52 - Jul 31 by Oldboy |
So I provide the fact and the proof, yet I am the one twisting things. Never mind. |
Its not twisted, you have provided no facts nor proof that can be backed up, the fact is you posted a comment that was open for all to reply to which unless you have edited it can be seen and interpreted by all that its open to comment on and that's you overlooking the fact that even if it were addressed to someone directly every member of this forum still has the right to reply to it if they so desire, as I said if a comment clearly stated someone's name in it then more often than not I choose not to reply to said post, you do understand how this or any forum works don't you, if you wish to reply to someone without others being able to reply on it too I suggest you take the private message route!!
I have been straight forward with everything, including a question to you that you don't even have the decency to answer or can't answer without it supporting my initial view making you in the wrong for trying to have a dig at me in the first place!!
Feel free to imply I twist thing again if you think it will save you face!! |  | | |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 08:48 - Aug 1 with 311 views | Oldboy |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 02:32 - Aug 1 by Bluearmy71 |
Its not twisted, you have provided no facts nor proof that can be backed up, the fact is you posted a comment that was open for all to reply to which unless you have edited it can be seen and interpreted by all that its open to comment on and that's you overlooking the fact that even if it were addressed to someone directly every member of this forum still has the right to reply to it if they so desire, as I said if a comment clearly stated someone's name in it then more often than not I choose not to reply to said post, you do understand how this or any forum works don't you, if you wish to reply to someone without others being able to reply on it too I suggest you take the private message route!!
I have been straight forward with everything, including a question to you that you don't even have the decency to answer or can't answer without it supporting my initial view making you in the wrong for trying to have a dig at me in the first place!!
Feel free to imply I twist thing again if you think it will save you face!! |
Just to clarify. My first post on this thread was in reply to the Op. If it was to you, your post would also be in mine. That is how it works on this forum. You then replied to my comment (my post is in yours) thinking I had replied to you, when I had replied to the Op. On the home page people write the person's name as their post doesn't show in their post, but on this page, if I was replying to you, your post would be in mine. Hope that clears it up for you. You have accused me of not reading your post in full, while I have accused you of not reading mine correctly. No saving of faces needed, just a misunderstanding. We both come out of this with our reputations as the board leaders in tact. Have a lovely Sunday. |  | | |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 16:55 - Aug 1 with 250 views | Bluearmy71 |
| Ipswich vs Millwall - This is a Friendly on 08:48 - Aug 1 by Oldboy |
Just to clarify. My first post on this thread was in reply to the Op. If it was to you, your post would also be in mine. That is how it works on this forum. You then replied to my comment (my post is in yours) thinking I had replied to you, when I had replied to the Op. On the home page people write the person's name as their post doesn't show in their post, but on this page, if I was replying to you, your post would be in mine. Hope that clears it up for you. You have accused me of not reading your post in full, while I have accused you of not reading mine correctly. No saving of faces needed, just a misunderstanding. We both come out of this with our reputations as the board leaders in tact. Have a lovely Sunday. |
Dude in this part of the forum you can reply to any post and to any comment you wish regardless if its aimed directly at another person, we at no point were talking about the new section!! I hope your day is good too, some of mine will be spent watching the grand prix. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
