| Ukraine latest: Very obvious false flag part 634 14:04 - Feb 21 with 2106 views | Steve_M |
The Russian military are claiming to have destroyed Ukrainian vehicles within Russia.
That sounds incredible convincing but looks to be another step up in terms of posturing. |  |
| |  |
| [Redacted] on 16:38 - Feb 21 with 350 views | victorywilhappen |
| Ukraine latest: Very obvious false flag part 634 on 15:32 - Feb 21 by Pinewoodblue |
The biggest risk is if things don’t go Russia’s way with any invasion. They have hundreds of battlefield nuclear weapons which, if they explode on contact, rather than in the air, cause devastation over a relatively small area and with limited radioactive fallout.
The West just doesn’t have such weapons available to them. The only response the West has is cruise missiles or escalate further. |
[Redacted] |  | | |
| Ukraine latest: Very obvious false flag part 634 on 17:51 - Feb 21 with 293 views | Guthrum |
| Ukraine latest: Very obvious false flag part 634 on 14:28 - Feb 21 by Churchman |
He is 69 so to make his mark on history it has to be sooner rather than later. The west is weak, militarily and particularly politically. Biden has shown his hand and so have the Germans. They are all that matters.
If I was them, I’d swallow Ukraine right now and follow it up immediately with the Baltic states. Threaten the rest of the Slavic states and Poland and then with the rusty sabre rattling (toothpick in the UKs case) at its highest, go to the negotiating table with the west. The EU would be grovelling in gratitude and Biden looking forward to his afternoon nap.
What Putin is doing is outrageous and disgraceful - but entirely logical from his viewpoint. The real tragedy is the innocent lives that’ll be lost. [Post edited 21 Feb 2022 14:33]
|
If he pushes it that far, there will be a major war. The Baltics, Poland, etc., are all part of NATO, thus with mutual defence treaties. Russia will lose, then things risk getting nuclear.
Ukraine does not have that and is a troubled state in any case, which is why neither NATO nor the EU will commit troops to fending off a Russian invasion.
I'm thinking currently that Russia will recognise (and perhaps try to expand a bit) the breakaway areas in the Donbas, maybe even move in as "peacekeepers", but not actually go for a full-scale overruning of the whole country. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
