Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) 16:24 - Feb 26 with 707 views | Mr_Ipswich | |  | | |  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:25 - Feb 26 with 681 views | jeera | If you think the scoreline is down to those two alone... |  |
|  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:26 - Feb 26 with 654 views | Illinoisblue | Nothing wrong with Bakinson. Thompson no better than Penney |  |
|  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:27 - Feb 26 with 632 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:26 - Feb 26 by Illinoisblue | Nothing wrong with Bakinson. Thompson no better than Penney |
Agree with that assessment. Think Bakinson has had a pretty decent game. |  | |  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:28 - Feb 26 with 599 views | JDB23 | Not sure I’d say too much against Bakinson, slightly different to what we already have and adds more depth. Thompson however is dreadful, especially in this system. Swindon is definitely his level. |  | |  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:29 - Feb 26 with 574 views | Schmoke | Tell us why... |  | |  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:30 - Feb 26 with 558 views | gordon | Agree with this generally - Bakinson is OK sometimes but no better than other options, but Thompson is nowhere near Penney or KVY in that position, he's really poor. |  | |  |
Bakinson and Thompson clearly not good enough additions (n/t) on 16:31 - Feb 26 with 538 views | Rjitfc | Bakinson has had a decent game Thompson, I really dont see what he offers that Penney doesn't. Nowhere near as threatening going forward and no better in defence. [Post edited 26 Feb 2022 16:32]
|  |
|  |
| |