| Connor Wickham 13:27 - Nov 15 with 4252 views | clive_baker |
Do we think he could be a realistic option in Jan?
He's available on a free, still only 29, and is enjoying a good spell for bottom of the league Forest Green. You wouldn't have thought it would be too hard to tempt him away from staying on there. Physical presence, can hold the ball up, can also operate a bit wider. The question mark will always be fitness with him, but I just wonder whether he might be a serious option for us that is based on more than just nostalgia? |  |
| |  |
| [Redacted] on 18:35 - Nov 15 with 451 views | victorywilhappen |
| Connor Wickham on 13:54 - Nov 15 by Guthrum |
For me, would be a better option than Rhodes.
But not convinced Wickham is who we'd go for. More likely a Prem youth as a direct replacement for the injured John-Jules. |
[Redacted] |  | | |
| Connor Wickham on 18:51 - Nov 15 with 416 views | Parky |
I don’t think we can recall him anyway, but would you not just prefer Pigott? The side is completely different to the one he struggled in last season. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
