Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on 18:15 - Feb 11 with 1038 views | onceablue | I think we win that match if he did Chaplin had started to find little holes than Harness was never going to do I think also Hirst was destined to score winner or not in the end |  | | |  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:19 - Feb 11 with 988 views | pointofblue | I thought Chaplin was tiring but I have brought on Aluko at that point rather than Harness. The Hirst sub didn't work at all IMO. |  |
|  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:25 - Feb 11 with 934 views | McCall | Sorry, Hirst is gash |  | |  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 19:11 - Feb 11 with 835 views | backwaywhen |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:25 - Feb 11 by McCall | Sorry, Hirst is gash |
Best game he has had for us today , slightly wobbly to start , but unsettled their back line with grit and determination, and looked far better than he has done thus far , as regard the whole team , that penalty miss messed with our heads and we started to crumble , score it and we go on to Win IMO , could quite have easily dominated like we did in 2nd half …….. that miss was defining . |  | |  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:02 - Feb 11 with 767 views | LeoMuff | Do think they were subs for subs sake, we were all over them, so why change ? Def felt like it cost us momentum, Chaplin in particular should have stayed on imho |  |
|  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:07 - Feb 11 with 740 views | finidi_whooah | Hirst is a poor mans ladapo |  | |  |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:39 - Feb 11 with 694 views | Exiled2Surrey |
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:02 - Feb 11 by LeoMuff | Do think they were subs for subs sake, we were all over them, so why change ? Def felt like it cost us momentum, Chaplin in particular should have stayed on imho |
That’s also what Mick Mills thinks - i think that Wednesday only made two subs? He made the sensible point that actually the system had only been working for about 30 minutes when the subs came and we slightly conceded the advantage at that point. I would also say that this loss of momentum also coincided with the time that their player went down for a “head injury”. That was clearly tactical. Maybe we should have done that after the first goal… |  | |  |
| |