| Subs 06:29 - Apr 3 with 3038 views | WolfieAtTheBack |
What a game last night, bloody brilliant. If we can really tonk Wolves on Saturday you just never know do you.
However, should we not be keeping Encisco and Delap on for 90 mins win, lose or draw given the fact they are our best players and neither will be here next season so we get everything out of it that we can whilst performing the great escape? [Post edited 3 Apr 6:31]
|  | | |  |
| Subs on 13:53 - Apr 3 with 226 views | BlueBadger |
| Subs on 12:51 - Apr 3 by ArnieM |
There's tinkering, and there's tinkering isn't there. Changing 5-6 players every game is on the heavy side of tinkering ..changing 1-2 is trying something different. But to be at this stage of the season , and still making wholesale changes , suggests to me he still doesn't know his best side . Surely you'd agree that changing 5-6 players just about every game is not going to help continuity ?
I wonder if he'll change again, for Sat , what was a very good solid defensive unit last night? |
How comes you never ever respond to the point that the primary driver of a lack of settled side is injuries and keep constantly wanging on about 'tinkering' as if it wasn't something that your boy Cookie never stopped doing? |  |
| |
| Subs on 15:18 - Apr 3 with 188 views | billlm |
| Subs on 12:01 - Apr 3 by TractorFrog |
I think yes to those first two. We have consistently got better results with Morsy than with Phillips, and Johnson is perhaps the weakest link of the team but he is the only one that can play that role and not look out of position. I wish Burns or Ogbene were available to play there but without them, it has to be Johnson. |
I'd have Phillips over morsy now,
And I wouldn't bring Davis back in his injury might be a blessing in disguise, |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
