| He is not going to Brentford 06:50 - Jun 13 with 5074 views | muccletonjoe |
The part of this speculation which does cause concern is why he doesn't come out and say so. |  | | |  |
| He is not going to Brentford on 14:25 - Jun 14 with 351 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| He is not going to Brentford on 09:41 - Jun 13 by positivity |
the man's allowed a holiday! he can't hold a press conference for every job he's linked with.
just accept he's here now; one day he'll leave for a bigger job (like bobby & alf) or because he's failed or been deemed to have failed (like everyone else).
enjoy him while he's here and don't stress, life will go on, itfc will go on! |
Point of order:
Not like *everybody* else.
In my lifetime (Robson era onwards):
John Lyall semi-retired upstairs.
Joe Royle is debatable, but pretty much decided to retire when the squad was dismantled from under him. I don't think it would be fair to say he had been deemed to have failed, though.
Even Jim Magilton was couched in terms of "A new owner wants to bring his own man in", I think. |  | | |
| He is not going to Brentford on 14:30 - Jun 14 with 328 views | positivity |
| He is not going to Brentford on 14:25 - Jun 14 by ArnoldMoorhen |
Point of order:
Not like *everybody* else.
In my lifetime (Robson era onwards):
John Lyall semi-retired upstairs.
Joe Royle is debatable, but pretty much decided to retire when the squad was dismantled from under him. I don't think it would be fair to say he had been deemed to have failed, though.
Even Jim Magilton was couched in terms of "A new owner wants to bring his own man in", I think. |
yeah, that's fair for lyall and royle.
jim was "deemed to have failed"by evans. for me, i think he should have had more time | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
