| ITFC, Brum, QPR, Preston, Coventry, Hull 22:15 - Aug 9 with 530 views | Matt_Netherlands |
Strangely, that’s the order of the teams currently on 1 point.
And I can’t make it add up.
Friday Night: Birmingham 1 - Town 1
Saturday afternoon: QPR 1 - Preston 1
Saturday lunchtime: Coventry 0 - Hull 0
Ok so the first four teams have all scored a goal so would expect them to be higher on that basis.
Alphabetical order? Nope.
Away teams given the higher position? Nope. Birmingham and QPR the home teams.
Order of matches played? Nope (Friday night, Saturday 3pm, Saturday 12.30pm)
Fair play rules? Nope. We have 3 yellows and Birmingham have 2. [Post edited 9 Aug 22:19]
|  | | |  |
| ITFC, Brum, QPR, Preston, Coventry, Hull on 22:28 - Aug 9 with 399 views | _clive_baker_ |
Why would when the games are played impact the league table?
It’s points, then goal difference, then goals scored, and then head-to-head for that season which includes away goals.
Hence we’re above Brum. |  | | |
| ITFC, Brum, QPR, Preston, Coventry, Hull on 23:09 - Aug 9 with 257 views | Matt_Netherlands |
| ITFC, Brum, QPR, Preston, Coventry, Hull on 22:28 - Aug 9 by _clive_baker_ |
Why would when the games are played impact the league table?
It’s points, then goal difference, then goals scored, and then head-to-head for that season which includes away goals.
Hence we’re above Brum. |
Would probably help if I could read… Preston are below us and not Birmingham. What an idiot. | | | |
| ITFC, Brum, QPR, Preston, Coventry, Hull on 23:25 - Aug 9 with 198 views | urbanpenguin |
I remember when tables weren't published until after the game, which seems sensible as it's all academic. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
