Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Where is the physicality we were told we needed? 15:58 - Aug 23 with 474 viewscbower

It's conspicuous by absence. Not one Town player in that starting 11 is winning the physical battle overall. Even Hirst, O'Shea and Greaves are not physically dominating.
69% possession, shots on target, you got it, zero. Successful crosses? 2/14 ffs. Tackles won - 2 (PNE - 9).
Neither Matusiwa nor Taylor can turn with the ball to start attacks. Clarke, one good cross aside and a bit of a run is anonymous. Szmodics is a striker best off the shoulder. He's lost as a 10 and is not clever like Chaplin. We're dominating possession but we're as blunt as a Badger's ar$e!

bluescouser

3
Where is the physicality we were told we needed? on 16:13 - Aug 23 with 366 viewsjontysnut

0
Where is the physicality we were told we needed? on 16:15 - Aug 23 with 340 viewsblueoutlook

Exactly. Been saying the same. Where is the physicality? Mind you, we need big guys for that. We have midgets compared to most teams in this league. We will get bullied week in week out at this rate.
0
Where is the physicality we were told we needed? on 16:17 - Aug 23 with 282 viewsSwailsey

We let three of them (Morsy, Mass and Burgess) walk out the door because we told them they wouldn’t get game time.
[Post edited 23 Aug 16:18]

Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025