If I was Mr EFL… 06:38 - Sep 23 with 779 views | LowerNorth | I would say, take a point each or replay the match! What do you think each club would say, and what would you choose?!? I’m not suggesting this would happen. Just a bored thought, and one to throw in the mixer! |  | | |  |
If I was Mr EFL… on 07:47 - Sep 23 with 566 views | BlueDouglas | Both would say nah! Can you imagine the Burn supporters if their club agreed to that! |  | |  |
If I was Mr EFL… on 09:18 - Sep 23 with 378 views | Scuzzer | I was thinking the same thing. Isn't this a measured approach, both teams getting a point out of a difficult situation? |  |
|  |
If I was Mr EFL… on 09:23 - Sep 23 with 340 views | WeWereZombies | I'm now waiting for the supporter who posts on here as 'Solomon' to make their views known. |  |
|  |
If I was Mr EFL… on 09:24 - Sep 23 with 339 views | MattinLondon |
If I was Mr EFL… on 09:18 - Sep 23 by Scuzzer | I was thinking the same thing. Isn't this a measured approach, both teams getting a point out of a difficult situation? |
No it’s trying to appease both clubs which ultimately fails both. It’s like a ref awarding a penalty which he knows is harsh but doesn’t want to lose face by changing his mind. He then awards another soft penalty to the other team - simply annoys both. The right decision is to replay in full - that’s the precedent set and for consistency should be followed. |  | |  |
If I was Mr EFL… on 13:59 - Sep 23 with 149 views | football | I'd say no, that doesn't help us. The game should be re-played in full only once the EFL are satisfied that it can be hosted without any other issues.That precedent has been set and pretty sure our club won't settle for anything less without a real fight |  | |  |
| |