Forum | Is it illegal to make a substitute before 65 minutes? by Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Is it illegal to make a substitute before 65 minutes? 17:14 - Nov 22 with 500 views

Apkom was having an absolute shocker, in a game that we needed to create or get the ball up the pitch Cajuste and Nunez coming on for 16 minutes was so annoying. It wasn’t coming from Taylor or Akpom was it?

It just seems to process driven and pre planned!

Poll:

Ok gut feeling then, promotion?

Is it illegal to make a substitute before 65 minutes? on 17:21 - Nov 22 with 458 views

Herbivore

Generally our substitutions work well for us. We've picked up loads of points from our subs coming on and making an impact this season and in previous seasons too. But thee are times we need to change sooner. It was obvious today that Azon and Akpom weren't impacting the game and we should have changed things at half time.

Poll:	Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog:	Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

Is it illegal to make a substitute before 65 minutes? on 17:29 - Nov 22 with 389 views

Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior

Is it illegal to make a substitute before 65 minutes? on 17:21 - Nov 22 by Herbivore
Generally our substitutions work well for us. We've picked up loads of points from our subs coming on and making an impact this season and in previous seasons too. But thee are times we need to change sooner. It was obvious today that Azon and Akpom weren't impacting the game and we should have changed things at half time.

Yes this game was crying out for it.

Didn’t like the look of the front four going into it. No Nunez or Cajuste, it never felt like we were going to be at our most creative.

Poll:

Ok gut feeling then, promotion?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread