Forum | Ridiculous rule by Nthsuffolkblue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Ridiculous rule 15:23 - Jan 25 with 332 views

How can an accidental handball be a yellow card?

I can understand it leading to a penalty from a goal-bound shot but accidental means there is no intent from the player and yet he gets penalised with a yellow card.

Poll:	Who is the greatest threat to the UK right now?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Ridiculous rule on 15:25 - Jan 25 with 313 views

redrickstuhaart

How can accidental handball be handball tbh...

But yes. they have made a massive mess of the handball rules. And that is absurd.

Poll:

Will the US Mid terms get cancelled or "postponed"?

Ridiculous rule on 15:46 - Jan 25 with 222 views

EastTownBlue

Until the recent law change that would have been a red card. Going further back handball would have had to be intentional in the first place to be given.

Ridiculous rule on 15:47 - Jan 25 with 215 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Ridiculous rule on 15:25 - Jan 25 by redrickstuhaart
How can accidental handball be handball tbh... But yes. they have made a massive mess of the handball rules. And that is absurd.

I can see the logic of it preventing the goal leading to the penalty. I can understand why that is contentious too. I can see the professional foul rule leading to a yellow card/red card outside the area. However, it has led to the anomaly of an accidental offence leading to a yellow card. That is wrong should see a change to the rules that an accidental handball is not a disciplinary offence at all (i.e. no yellow or red card).

Poll:	Who is the greatest threat to the UK right now?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Ridiculous rule on 15:53 - Jan 25 with 204 views

CrayonKing

Assume you mean the Palace v Chelsea one? Absolutely atrocious officiating. They spent so long looking for an angle or a freeze-frame that would allow them to give it. His arm was by his side and it his his chest at the same time. There was absolutely nothing he could have done to avoid it.

Ridiculous rule on 15:56 - Jan 25 with 183 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Ridiculous rule on 15:53 - Jan 25 by CrayonKing
Assume you mean the Palace v Chelsea one? Absolutely atrocious officiating. They spent so long looking for an angle or a freeze-frame that would allow them to give it. His arm was by his side and it his his chest at the same time. There was absolutely nothing he could have done to avoid it.

It is a poor rule not poor officiating.

Poll:	Who is the greatest threat to the UK right now?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Ridiculous rule on 16:17 - Jan 25 with 136 views

CrayonKing

Ridiculous rule on 15:56 - Jan 25 by Nthsuffolkblue
It is a poor rule not poor officiating.

I think it's both tbh. If you have to look that many times to find an excuse to give it then it's not overturning a clear and obvious error.

Ridiculous rule on 16:25 - Jan 25 with 121 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Ridiculous rule on 16:17 - Jan 25 by CrayonKing
I think it's both tbh. If you have to look that many times to find an excuse to give it then it's not overturning a clear and obvious error.

VAR is rubbish. There was no need for it to take that long but that is typical of it too. They are determined to get it absolutely right so to check every detail ... and still don't improve the outcomes.

Poll:	Who is the greatest threat to the UK right now?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread