Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence 00:36 - Jul 12 with 501 viewspointofblue

Even if it did work against Mexico.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

2
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:37 - Jul 12 with 499 viewsGuthrum

No point running Bellingham into the ground, tho.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:38 - Jul 12 with 491 viewspointofblue

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:37 - Jul 12 by Guthrum

No point running Bellingham into the ground, tho.


No but Mainoo? Rashford with Eze moving inside?

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:41 - Jul 12 with 448 viewsGuthrum

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:38 - Jul 12 by pointofblue

No but Mainoo? Rashford with Eze moving inside?


I'd have gone Rashford. He's scored useful goals this tournament. Good for pens, too, if needed.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:42 - Jul 12 with 441 viewspointofblue

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:41 - Jul 12 by Guthrum

I'd have gone Rashford. He's scored useful goals this tournament. Good for pens, too, if needed.


Certainly better IMO than this. Of course, if we hold on, it would have worked but it's courting disaster.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:44 - Jul 12 with 421 viewsGuthrum

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:42 - Jul 12 by pointofblue

Certainly better IMO than this. Of course, if we hold on, it would have worked but it's courting disaster.


Really, yes I agree.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:48 - Jul 12 with 389 viewsGuthrum

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:42 - Jul 12 by pointofblue

Certainly better IMO than this. Of course, if we hold on, it would have worked but it's courting disaster.


Good Dan Burn header at the end, tho.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 07:49 - Jul 12 with 279 viewsPioneerBlue

Defence is not my favourite form of attack either. There are lots of mitigating factors RB, Rice, Mexico followed by Florida conditions. The competition really starts now because a WC SF is the kind of level you feel happy with in the event you go out, but now we have to play both Argentina and FIFAs favourite most over protected player.

Blog: Ipswich Ramblings

0
I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 07:59 - Jul 12 with 264 viewstonybied

I'm not keen on it either, but it's worked twice now, so it's hard to argue against it.
2
Login to get fewer ads

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 09:23 - Jul 12 with 215 viewsRadioOrwell

I hate inviting pressure by adding to the defence on 00:48 - Jul 12 by Guthrum

Good Dan Burn header at the end, tho.


Loved seeing their big bloke sub being countered with our big bloke sub.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026