| Our attacking threat 18:32 - Sep 11 with 513 views | Nutkins_Return |
For me Maeda has to stay in. Particularly for away days.
But we now have the possibility of
Fatawu Enciso Philogene as a 3 behind the striker. That's serious attacking threat. I mean the defensive side would be a bit of a concern but the goal threat and potential supply is quality! |  |
| |  |
| Our attacking threat on 18:51 - Sep 11 with 447 views | quad |
Not trying to rubbish him, but why do you think Maeda has to stay in?
For me he was anonymous against Liverpool, can't see that he is an improvement on Mehmeti even.
I know he works his socks off and is good defensively, but is that enough?
Fatawu was an attacking threat on the right, Jaden and Clarke are an attacking threat on the left, but I don't see it with Maeda. Different type of player I know. But still. | | | |
| Our attacking threat on 18:54 - Sep 11 with 435 views | blueoutlook |
| Our attacking threat on 18:51 - Sep 11 by quad |
Not trying to rubbish him, but why do you think Maeda has to stay in?
For me he was anonymous against Liverpool, can't see that he is an improvement on Mehmeti even.
I know he works his socks off and is good defensively, but is that enough?
Fatawu was an attacking threat on the right, Jaden and Clarke are an attacking threat on the left, but I don't see it with Maeda. Different type of player I know. But still. |
If Maeda is left out it has to be Clarke. Jaden disappears in away games. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
