We didn't play badly 18:33 - Oct 14 with 1614 views | Guthrum | But we also didn't play well enough. Absorbed a lot of pressure. Probably missed Garner's troublemaking. | |
| | |
We didn't play badly on 18:37 - Oct 14 with 1585 views | strikalite | Can imagine we missed Adeyemi in the middle too? | | | |
We didn't play badly on 10:22 - Oct 15 with 1387 views | madmouse1959 | A negative defensive shambles We didn,t show up for a battle or a win.....we just went through the motions just like last season. Not enough quality....end of. | |
| |
We didn't play badly on 10:59 - Oct 15 with 1351 views | Darth_Koont |
We didn't play badly on 10:22 - Oct 15 by madmouse1959 | A negative defensive shambles We didn,t show up for a battle or a win.....we just went through the motions just like last season. Not enough quality....end of. |
Don't think that's right at all. We were a little toothless without Garner but no faulting the effort or the willingness to get forward. We just weren't good enough/lucky enough on the day and still too disjointed in possession, which seems to be our common failing. | |
| |
We didn't play badly on 16:55 - Oct 15 with 1266 views | bluehook | No faulting Dids and Waghorn’s efforts, but it was a hopelessly toothless midfield. Nydam looked like what he is - a schoolboy learning the game. The defence, apart from Knudsen was also dire. Endless hoofing and poor passing - even from our so called ‘cultured’ defender/midfielder Webster. Watch their goal, neither Webster or Kenlock put in any effort to block the cross whatsoever. | | | |
| |