By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Short version: So comparing the QALYs lost to the lockdown (which you don’t know) to the QALYs lost to the virus (which you also don’t know) is extremely difficult.
Well yes... a more interesting comparison would be between the cost of not adequately funding your healthcare system (so you can give out miniscule tax cuts) and the resultant cost of reacting far too late when an unfortunate pandemic arrives to shine a searchlight on your catastrophically misguided policies.
I'm not sure there has ever been any argument against the futility of putting in place a partial voluntary lockdown three weeks too late.
Also to add that the big mistake a lot of people seem to be making when comparing the cost is basing the comparison against the number of COVID deaths which are happening in lockdown, rather than whatever the number and difference would be if we weren’t in lockdown (which is impossible to know although clearly there are some very clever people out there who can and have modelled various scenarios)
Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010