Trying to get the sack 16:37 - Nov 28 with 652 views | Jeff_winger | It seems obvious Lambert wants the boot. Why start Cornell (although he is playing ok) Starting Gibbs is just crazy and not fair on young lad. Bringing drinan on instead of Hawkins. None of that makes sense unless trying to get the sack. I do wonder if Gibbs starting was a dig at fans for targeting senior players (in Lambert eyes). |  | | |  |
Trying to get the sack on 16:45 - Nov 28 with 586 views | Garv | It's either Gibbs or playing someone out of position, which we have to do anyway. He did okay. Drinan has been more mobile than Hawkins would have been, so I don't get that argument. Calculated risk by chucking him in I guess. |  |
|  |
Trying to get the sack on 16:51 - Nov 28 with 516 views | Jeff_winger |
Trying to get the sack on 16:45 - Nov 28 by Garv | It's either Gibbs or playing someone out of position, which we have to do anyway. He did okay. Drinan has been more mobile than Hawkins would have been, so I don't get that argument. Calculated risk by chucking him in I guess. |
Gibbs was in no way ready for that game, he did well considering but some passes were awful, when they should have been simple. Totally unfair on him guess mcgavin looked similar last year when he got hooked at half time but he has come good |  | |  |
Trying to get the sack on 16:52 - Nov 28 with 493 views | BlueBadger |
Trying to get the sack on 16:45 - Nov 28 by Garv | It's either Gibbs or playing someone out of position, which we have to do anyway. He did okay. Drinan has been more mobile than Hawkins would have been, so I don't get that argument. Calculated risk by chucking him in I guess. |
We could have started with Jackson and Bennets as wide forwards, Judge in his 'best' position in midfield and put Dobra on the bench. No-one out of position there. |  |
|  |
| |