Forum | Vaccine question... by BanksterDebtSlave

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Vaccine question... 09:41 - Jan 10 with 406 views

Is the protection afforded having been an asymptomatic carrier of the virus equal to, better than or worse than that offered by the vaccine in terms of efficacy and longevity or is it not known?

[Post edited 10 Jan 2021 12:34]

	"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll:	If the choice is Moore or no more.

Vaccihe question... on 09:44 - Jan 10 with 388 views

WD19

Not yet known.

Vaccihe question... on 09:44 - Jan 10 with 385 views

m14_blue

Think the vaccine is significantly better, not sure about long lasting.

Vaccihe question... on 11:11 - Jan 10 with 323 views

longtimefan

Vaccihe question... on 09:44 - Jan 10 by WD19
Not yet known.

The Oxford vaccine Director said on R4 this morning that generally the antibody response is related to the how bad the symptoms experienced by the individual are. So someone who suffers badly will generally generate a larger immune response. Logically I’d therefore think those without symptoms would generate little in the way of antibody response.

Vaccihe question... on 12:29 - Jan 10 with 285 views

BanksterDebtSlave

Vaccihe question... on 11:11 - Jan 10 by longtimefan
The Oxford vaccine Director said on R4 this morning that generally the antibody response is related to the how bad the symptoms experienced by the individual are. So someone who suffers badly will generally generate a larger immune response. Logically I’d therefore think those without symptoms would generate little in the way of antibody response.

Interesting...thanks.

	"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll:	If the choice is Moore or no more.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread